ISSN: 2754-4974 | Open Access

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology & Toxicology

Isaac Newton’s “Active Principles, Particles” and the Cellular Dust Hypothesis; Rewriting Cytology and Histology in the Light of S.A.M.S.

Author(s): Seun Ayoade

Abstract

A new and exciting alternative to evolution is the cellular dust/microzyman theory of origin. The cellular dust/microzyman theory of origin states that life and the cosmos came to be as a result of chemical reactions carried out by imperishable miniscule/microscopic entities called microzyma/cellular dust [1-2] This theory has far reaching implications for the present hierarchical classification of organization in the human being escpecially in the light of the Bongham corpuscles and the Primo vascular system. And how does cellular dust compare with the active principles mentioned by Sir Isaac Newton?

A new and exciting alternative to evolution is the cellular dust/ microzyman theory of origin. The cellular dust/microzyman theory of origin states that life and the cosmos came to be as a result of chemical reactions carried out by imperishable miniscule/ microscopic entities called microzyma/cellular dust [1-2].

“All these things being consider’d, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d Matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the End for which he form’d them; and that these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard, as never to wear or break in pieces; no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation. While the Particles continue entire, they may compose Bodies of one and the same Nature and Texture in all Ages: But should they wear away, or break in pieces, the Nature of Things depending on them, would be changed. It seems to me farther, that these Particles have not only a Vis inertiae, accompanied with such passive Laws of Motion as naturally result from the Force, but also that they are moved by certain active Principles, such as is that of Gravity, and that which causes Fermentation, and the Cohesion of Bodies. These Principles I consider, not as occult Qualities, supposed to result from the specifick Forms of Things, but as general Laws of Nature, by which the Things themselves are form’d; their Truth appearing to us by Phaenomena, though their Causes be not yet discover’d” [3].

Is this a pre-1841 description of the microzymas? Let us consider Sir Isaac Newton’s “active principles/particles” in the light of the microzymas. Apart from Newton’s very strong creationist bent (he viciously attacks evolution-like ideas) and postulating that the “active principles/particles” could be destroyed (under extreme conditions) their description goes almost hand in glove with cellular dust. Is it possible that Sir Isaac Newton (1642- 1727) saw the microzymas under the microscope? Considering the microscope was in its infancy in Newton’s day it is more likely Sir Isaac merely predicted and theorized their existence. Either way one is freshly in awe of Isaac newton’s genius! And mighty proud of myself for being lucky enough to independently come up with ideas akin to yet more coherent vis-à-vis those of such a great mind.

When the idea that the entire universe had been created by chemical reactions carried out by microzymas occurred to me early one morning in July 2018 little did I know that 300 years ago Sir Isaac Newton had propounded a not too dissimilar theory-to a certain degree. The major difference between the cellular dust hypothesis and Newton’s active principle postulate being Isaac Newton separating the particles and the active principles moving them, whereas in the Cellular Dust Hypothesis the microzyma/ cellular dust are self-motile. Also Newton regarded the particles as being primary constituents of both living and non-living things (the widely read Newton was probably speaking with the knowledge of the ancient Greek philosopher Democritus’ theory of atoms or the Aristotelian elements) whereas in the germ terrain duality theory/ cellular dust hypothesis only living things contain coordinated microzymas. [4-9].

I close with Newton’s scornful and somewhat narrow minded attack on evolutionary thought-“Now by the help of these Principles, all material Things seem to have been composed of the hard and solid Particles above-mention’d, variously associated in the first Creation by the Counsel of an intelligent Agent. For it became him who created them to set them in order. And if he did so, it’s unphilosophical to seek for any other Origin of the World, or to pretend that it might arise out of a Chaos by the mere Laws of Nature; though being once form’d, it may continue by those Laws for many Ages. For while Comets move in very excentrick Orbs in all manner of Positions, blind Fate could never make all the Planets move one and the same way in Orbs concentrick, some inconsiderable Irregularities excepted, which may have risen from the mutual Actions of Comets and Planets upon one another, and which will be apt to increase, till this System wants a Reformation. Such a wonderful Uniformity in the Planetary System must be allowed the Effect of Choice. And so must the Uniformity in the Bodies of Animals, they having generally a right and a left side shaped alike, and on either side of their Bodies two Legs behind, and either two Arms, or two Legs, or two Wings before upon their Shoulders, and between their Shoulders a Neck running down into a Back-bone, and a Head upon it; and in the Head two Ears, two Eyes, a Nose, a Mouth, and a Tongue, alike situated. Also the first Contrivance of those very artificial Parts of Animals, the Eyes, Ears, Brain, Muscles, Heart, Lungs, Midriff, Glands, Larynx, Hands, Wings, swimming Bladders, natural Spectacles, and other Organs of Sense and Motion; and the Instinct of Brutes and Insects, can be the effect of nothing else than the Wisdom and Skill of a powerful ever-living Agent, who being in all Places, is more able by his Will to move the Bodies within his boundless uniform Sensorium, and thereby to form and reform the Parts of our own Bodies.” [3].

S.A.M.S. (Seun Ayoade’s Medical System) acknowledges the existence of microzymas and the primo vascular system [10].In conventional medicine, there is a tiered system of organization of the human body/organism.

In the 4 tier system the levels are cells-tissues-organs-systems.In the 7 tier system the progression is atoms-molecules-organellescells-tissue-organ-system.Some may even favour a 5 tier system viz: stem cell-cell-tissue-organ-system. All three systems are no longer tenable in the light of the knowledge of the discoveries of the microzymas and the primo vascular system (and related Bongham corpuscles-which are roughly the size of stem cells). The Primo vascular system is a full-fledged system, yet is subcellular!. There is therefore, according to S.A.M.S. and the germ terrain duality theory on which it is based, no coherent hierarchy of organization within the human being. Just the microzymas and the structures built and ultimately run by the microzymas. In other words the cellular dust is not just the basic unit of life it is the only unit of life. Microzymas are the beginning and end of organization of all living things. [11-13].

References

  1. Seun A (2018) A New Origin of Life and the Universe ProposedMicrozymian!. Peer Re J Foren & Gen Sci 1. PRJFGS. MS.ID.000123. DOI: 10.32474/PRJFGS.2018.01.000123.
  2. Seun Ayoade (2018) Microzyman Theory of Origin (MTO)/ Cellular Dust Hypothesis (CDH)-Matters Arising. Peer Re J Foren & Gen Sci 2 PRJFGS.MS.ID.000141. DOI: 10.32474/ PRJFGS.2018.02.000141.
  3. Newton Isaac Query 31 of Opticks (London, 1704) Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light.
  4. Seun A (2018) Could Microzymas be the Elusive Dark Matter? Could Microzymas be the Force Behind Dark Energy?. Peer Re J Foren & GenSci 1. PRJFGS.MS.ID.000125. DOI: 10.32474/PRJFGS.2018.01.000125.
  5. Seun Ayoade (2019) The Cellular Dust Hypothesis and The Laws of Thermodynamics. Glob J Anes & Pain Med 1. GJAPM. MS.ID.000110. DOI: 10.32474/GJAPM.2019.01.000110.
  6. Ayoade S (2017) Koch’s Postulates and Germ Terrain Dualism; Cellular Dust as Yet Another Term for Microzymas. J Mol Genet Med 11: 297.
  7. Ayoade MS (2019) A New Natural Law Proposed - S.A.L.L.T. Anesthesiologist 1:1002.
  8. Seun Ayoade (2018) “A Few More Differences between the Theories Three” ARC Journal of Nursing and Healthcare 4: 1-2.
  9. Seun Ayoade (2017) The Differences Between the Germ Theory, the Terrain Theory and the Germ Terrrain Duality Theory; JOJ Nurse Health Care 4: 555631.
  10. Seun Ayoade (2018) Introducing S.A.M.S, Journal of Endocrinology and Disorders Doi: 10.31579/2640-1045/042.
  11. Fascia and Primo Vascular System, Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Chun Yang, Yikuan Du, Jian-bin Wu, Jun Wang , Ping Luan, Qin-lao Yang,1 and Lin Yuan 2, Academic Editor: Kwang-Sup Soh Volume 2015 |Article ID 303769.
  12. Charles Martin, Auburn scientist discovers microstructure of primo-vascular system, revealing possible foundation of how acupuncture works.
  13. Soh KS (2013) Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Ecam 31 :587827. DOI: 10.1155/2013/587827 PMID: 23983793 PMCID: PMC3747427.
View PDF