ISSN: 2755-0168 | Open Access

Journal of Biotechnology & Bioinformatics Research

Mode of Action, Mechanism and Role of Microbes in Bioremediation Service for Environmental Pollution Management

Author(s): Birhanu Gizaw Tegene

Abstract

Environmental pollution is the global sensitive issues currently resulting ecologicl crise, drastic climate change and biodiversity loss. Bioremediation is one of an ecofriendly and cost effective alternative strategy for removing different pollutant waste using microorganisms. Different types of ex-situ and in-situ bioremediation service these are biopiling, composting, Land farming, bioventing, biosparging, biostimulation, bioagumention are employed to treat heavy metal waste, Petroleum hydrocarbon, agro-industreal, dyestuff, agrochemicals, organic and volatile compound, lignocellulose biomass and nuclear waste. Several microorganisms (natural/exotic/ engineered) having specific metabolic capability and various enzyme production ability which fall under six main divisions include Oxidoreductases, Transferases, Hydrolases, Lyases, Isomerases and Ligases (synthetases) are used during bioremediation process. Understanding the mechanism, mode of action and role of microorgsnism in bioremediation process is essential to utilize microorganism potential and designe waste management strategy.

Introduction

Environmental pollution currently became one of the global sensitive issues. Rapid population growth and human activities, urbanization, unsafe agricultural practices and rapid industrialization brought huge environmental pollution due the release of various types of wastes. Municipal and domestic solid waste and swage, industrial effluent are source of pollutant containing of inorganic chemicals (NH3 , N2 , P,NO3 ,NO2 ), Organic chemicals and volatile organic cpd (Benzene, Toluene, Xylenes, Dichloromethane), Agro waste (Coffee pulp, bagasse, rice bran etc.), Heavy metals (Cd, Ld, Mercury, Cu, Pb, Chromium), Xenobiotic, Agrochemicals (Pesticide, fertilizer) , Chlorinated compounds, Dyes stuff (Azodye, vat dye, triphenylmethane, Anthraquione dye etc), Greenhouse gases, Hydrocarbons petroleum, Nuclear waste, Plastics, Polychlorinated, biphenyls, detergents , lubricants, nanoparticles, paints, disinfectants which contaminate agricultures soil, ground water, rivers and air in general terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem [26]. The report from the third world network showed that more than one billion pounds (450 million kilograms) of toxins are released globally in air and water. Approximately 6x106 chemical compounds have been synthesized with 1,000 new chemicals being synthesized annually. Almost 60,000 to 95,000 chemicals are in commercial use for different purpose [230]. In other study from industrial daily activities shows in each second about 310kg of toxic chemicals are entered into the air, land and water body with approximate amount 10 million tonnes per year globaly [218]. At global scale, 140 billion metric tons of agriculture biomass waste is produced every year like fronds, husk, shell, coffee (hull, husk, ground), (cob, stover, stalks, leaves), cotton (stalks), nuts (hulls), peanuts (shells), rice (hull/husk, straw, stalks), sugarcane (leavings, bagasse, molasses), vegetable wastes, etc [21]. In other study each year, human, livestock and crops by product generate approximately 38 billion metric tons of organic waste alone worldwide [56]. The estimated quantity of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) generated also worldwide is 1.7 ‑ 1.9 billion metric tons. Sources of waste generated 76% households, 18% institutions, commercial, factories, hotels, 6% is street sweeping. These municipal solid wastes composed of biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste consisting of high and low density polyethylene and organic lignocellulose waste. Often more than 50% of the solid waste produced is organic and biodegradable. Organic waste composed of the Lignocellulosic complex contains approximately 40 to 60% cellulose, 20 to 40% hemicellulose, and 10 to 25% lignin. Currently sever environmental pollution arise from non biodegredble plastic waste evok our ecosystem with an estimated amount reached to 500 billion to 1 trillion plasticbags are utilized worldwide [183]. Annually 140 milliontonnes of synthetic polymers are produced at a growing rate of 12% per year [90, 198]. The polyethylene bags or any other polyethylene based products are finally dumped into the landfills which pollute the environment at all [13, 93]. Other waste type is industry dye stuff, worldwide over 10,000 different dyes and pigments are used in dyeing and printing industries. The total world colorant production is estimated to be 8, 00,000 tons per year and at least 10% of the used dyestuff enters the environment through waste [121,162]. It is estimated that 2,80,000 tons of textile dyes are discharged in such industrial effluents every year worldwide [142]. Improper textile dye effluent disposal in aqueous ecosystems leads to the reduction in sunlight penetration which in turn decreases the photosynthetic activity, dissolved oxygen concentration, water quality and depicts acute toxic effects on aquatic flora and fauna, causing severe environmental problems world-wide [242]. Environmental pollution has great devastating impact on the biodiversity at all. The contaminants causing ecological problems leading to imbalance in nature is one of great global concern [63,205]. Global warming, drastic climate change, microbial community lapse, soil mineral depletion, species extiniction and biodiversity loss which leads to ecological crise. Consequence results more than 1 billion people around the world cannot get healthy air to breathe, 3 million die annually due to air pollution [235]. Globally, over 1 million seabirds and thousands of sea mammals are killed by pollution every year. More than3 million children under the age of 5 die annually from various environmental pollutions [45]. Biodiversity has also been significantly impacted, and more than 20% of bird species have become extinct in the last 200 years [240]. 39‑50% of the land surface of our planet was changed and modified due to human activities such as agriculture and urbanization, resulted the atmospheric CO2 concentration increased by 40% over the past 140 years [85]. Pollutant carcinogenic effect and their bioaccumulation and bio-magnification upset human and animal health like kidney damage, brain and nerve damage, testicular tissue destruction, respiratory problem, high blood pressure, gene defect, red blood cell destruction, liver problem, reproductive problem, depression and irritability, chromosome breakage, birth defect, psychopathological problem, stunt growth, unusual deformed birth and other complex problem on whole ecosystem biodiversity [147]. Several methods till now are implied and used for removing waste from environmental pollution using like chemical precipitation, photo catalysis, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, membrane processes, evaporation, purification, recycling, incineration, solvent extraction and adsorption [49]. Globally a huge budget is invested for the remediation of contaminated environment. The cost utilized for worldwide remediation of organic pollutants is projected to be USD 25-30 billion annually [143]. Remediation costs for sites contaminated with hazardous wastes in Europe are expected to exceed $1.5 trillion in the near future [46]. In the United States, the Office of Technological Assessment (OTA) of the U.S. Congress estimates that the cost of cleaning up more than 300,000 highly contaminated sites will exceed $500 billion [153]. There for cost effective and environmental friendy waste removal approach is timely important. Bioremediation is an optional and a modern concept for environmental pollution management highly involved in degradation, eradication, immobilization, or detoxification diverse chemical wastes and physical hazardous materials from the surrounding environment through the action of microorganisms and using their byprduct. Bioremediation can use biological agent i.e. Yeast, actinomyctes, fungi and bacteria to suppress or clear contamination [205]. Bioremediations not only a process of removing the pollutant from the environment but also it an ecofriendly and more effective process [195]. Generally it is less expensive method for the removal of hazardous contaminants. Bioremediation was first used commercially in 1972 to treat a Sun Oil gasoline pipeline spill in Ambler, Pennsylvania [176] and has been used almost as long as simple pump-and-treat technology. There are different bioremediation strategy these are bio mineralization, bio-sorbation, bio-stimulation, rhizoremediation, mycoremediation, bioventing, bioreactor, composting, bioagumentation, land farming, soil vapor extraction, soil washing and land filling [229]. The major mechanism of microorganism in mode of action for catalytic role using degrading enzymes or mineralizing various contaminants and converting non-toxic by-products during soil bioremediation processes [66,72,206]. Various enzymes are produced by microorganisms fall under six main divisions include Oxidoreductases, Transferases, Hydrolases, Lyases, Isomerases and Ligases (synthetases) during bioremediation process [124]. The purpose of bioremediation is to make environment free from pollution with help of environmental friendly microbes making the glob safe for the life of all inhabitants and proper functioning of biophysical networks of natrur. This paper reviews the role and mechanism of microbes in bioremediation process for environmental pollution control and detoxification of hazardous toxic compounds.

Microbial Remediation Strategies
Ex-Situ Bioremediation Strategies

In cases where soils cannot be treated in the contaminated site for in situ due to regulatory reasons or the unavailability of sufficient land, risk to ground water or air pollution, soils must be excavated into another place and bio remediated. The ex-situ bioremediation can be carried out by bio piling, composting, bioreactor, land farming methods of ex-situ bio-remediation service.

Bio-Piling

Bio-piles interchngably called as bio-cells, bio-heaps, bio-mounds and compost piles. This type of Ex-situ bioremediation strategy is used to reduce concentrations of petroleum pollutants in excavated soils during the time of biodegradation. Biopiles involve soil excavation, shifting and heaping into piles. The soil is packed on a protective layer formed by a bottom inert liner. In this process, air is supplied to the bio-pile system during a system of piping and pumps that either forces air into the pile under positive pressure or draws air through the pile under negative pressure [40]. The microbial activity is enhanced through microbial respiration then the result in degradation of adsorbed petroleum pollutant became high [47,107]. The basic bio pile system includes a treatment bed, an aeration system, an irrigation/nutrient system and a leachate collection system. For proper degradation there should be control of moisture, heat, nutrients, oxygen, and pH. The irrigation system is buried under the soil and provides air and nutrient through vacuum. To prevent the run off the soil is covered with plastic and due to which evaporation and volatilization is also prevented and promote the solar heating. Bio-pile treatment takes 20 days to 3 month to complete the procedure [155].

Land Farming

Land farming is a simple and less equipment requiring bioremediation approach in which contaminated soil is excavated and spread over a prepared bed and periodically tilled until pollutants are degraded. The goal is to stimulate indigenous biodegradative microorganisms and facilitate their aerobic degradation of contaminants in general the practice is limited to the treatment of superficial 10‑35 cm of soil [244]. Spilled oil and wood-preserving wastes have been bioremediated by land farming treatments [71,141]. Mostly for pesticide degradation, land farming is very important, the excavated soil is kept as sandwich layer in between clean and clay soil or concrete. It allows for natural degradation, it also provide oxygen, moisture and pH should also maintained by using lime.

Composting

Composting is one of ex-situ bioremediation strategy and an ancient technology practiced today at every scale from the backyard compost pile to large commercial operations. Basic and acceptable principles in the integrated solid waste management (ISWM) under the 4Rs principles which are involved as reductions reuse, recycling and recovery methods [87]. Composting occurs through the activity of microorganisms naturally found in soils. Under natural conditions earthworms, nematodes and soil insects such as mites, sow bugs, springtails, ants, and beetles do most of the initial mechanical breakdown of organic materials into smaller particles. Microorganism degrades the waste at elevated temperature that is ranges from 55- 65°C. During the process of degradation microbes release heat and increase the temperature which leads to the more solubility of waste and higher metabolic activity in composts. Compost “happens” either aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen) when organic materials are mixed and piled together. Aerobic composting is the most efficient form of decomposition and produces finished compost in the shortest time. Under controlled conditions, composters break down large particles through grinding or chopping. Once optimal physical conditions are established, soil bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes and protozoa colonize the organic material and initiate the composting process. There is no fixed time to produce finished compost. Duration depends on feed stocks, composting method used and management. It can take as little as three months and as long as two years. During aerobic composting, the average temperature curve within the piles showed three classic phases. (1) Mesophilic (moderate temperature phase), (2) thermophilic (high temperature phase) and (3) cooling and maturation phase. Bulking and air access are very necessary, in addition to allowing some control over the C: N ratio, another key purpose of adding plant-based materials to a compost mixture can be to provide structure and channels for aeration [79,255,256].

In-Situ Bioremediation Strategies

In situ bioremediation is the application of a biological treatment to clean up hazardous compounds present in the environment or contaminated site. The optimization and control of microbial transformations of organic contaminants requires the integration of many scientific and engineering disciplines. Bioremediation is carried in the contaminated area where enhanced microbial activities are achieved by creating a favorable environment to stimulate the natural or inoculated population of microorganisms and exploit their catabolic potential to grow and consume the contaminants as a food and energy source. Among the most important of the enzymes used by bacteria in degradation of organic compounds are oxygenases. Biodegradation or biotransformation rate is influenced by the type and concentration of specific contaminant present, Oxygen supply, moisture, temperature, pH, nutrient supply or bio-stimulation, bioaugmentation with strains containing desired catabolic properties and cometabolism [42]. There are different in-situ bioremediation techniques include bio slurping, bioventing bio-sparging, bioaugmentation, Microbial assisted phytoremediation.

Biosparging

In biosparging air is injected below the ground water under pressure to increase the concentration of oxygen for microbial degradation of pollutant. Biosparging increase the aerobic degradation and volatilization [122]. This technique is very similar to bioventing in that air is injected into soil subsurface to stimulate microbial activities in order to promote pollutant removal from polluted sites. Unlike bioventing, air is injected at the saturated zone, which can cause upward movement of volatile organic compounds to the unsaturated zone to promote biodegradation. The effectiveness of biosparging depends on two major factors namely soil permeability, which determines pollutant bioavailability to microorganisms, and pollutant biodegradability [169].

Bioventing

It is a technique to degrade any aerobically degradable compound. In bioventing the oxygen and nutrient like nitrogen and phosphorus is injected to the contaminated sit. The distribution of these nutrient and oxygen in soil is dependent on soil texture. In bioventing enough oxygen is provided through low air flow rate for microbes. Bioventing uses low air flow rates to provide only enough oxygen to sustain microbial activity. Oxygen is most commonly supplied through direct air injection into residual contamination in soil by means of wells. Bioventing is nothing but it is pumping of air into contaminated soil above the water table through well which sucked the air. Bioventing is more effective if the water table is deep from the surface and the area having high temperature. It is mainly used for the removal of gasoline, oil, petroleum etc. The rate removal of these substances is varied from one site to another site. This is just because of the difference in soil texture and different composition of hydrocarbons [179]. Effective bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil using bioventing has been proved by many researchers [10,119].

Bio Augmentation

It is one of the mechanisms of biodegradation. Microorganisms (natural/exotic/ engineered) having specific metabolic capability are introduced to the contaminated site for enhancing the degradation of waste. Therefore, bioaugmentation corresponds to an increase in the gene pool and thus the genetic diversity of the site. In principle, this genetic diversity could be increased by augmenting the microbial diversity [38,190]. This process can be enhanced by the continuous addition of microorganisms to a bioreactor for the above-ground treatment of ground waters. Commercial inoculants of enriched cultures consisting of one or more microbial species have been successfully used to colonize contaminated environments where the intrinsic microbial communities act on metals. In order to rapidly increasing the natural microorganism population growth and enhance degradation that preferentially feed on the contaminants site. Microbes are collected from the remediation site, separately cultured, genetically modified and returned to the site. Most commonly, it is used in municipal waste water treatment to restart activated sludge bioreactors. At sites where soil and ground water are contaminated with chlorinated ethanes, such as tetrachloro ethylene and trichloroethylene, bioaugmentation is used to ensure that the in situ microorganisms can completely degrade these contaminants to ethylene and chloride, which are nontoxic in nature [155]. Bioaugmentation is mainly undertaken in oil contaminated environments as an alternate strategy for bioremediation.

Bio Stimulation

This kind of strategic is the addition of specific nutrients usually sources of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, oxygen or other electron donors or acceptors at the site (soil/ground water) to stimulate the activity of indigenous microorganisms [179]. Amendments can be added in either liquid or gaseous form, via injection. Liquids can be injected into shallow or deep aquifers to stimulate the growth of microorganisms involved in the bioremediation. It is focus with in the stimulation of indigenous or naturally existing bacteria and fungus community. Firstly, by supplying fertilizers, growth supplements and traces minerals. By providing other environmental requirements like pH, temperature and oxygen to speed up their metabolism rate and pathway [95,101]. The Presence of small amount of pollutant can also act as stimulant by turning on the operons for bioremediation enzymes. This type of strategic path is most of the time continued in the addition of nutrients and oxygen to help indigenous microorganisms. These nutrients are the basic building blocks of life and allow microbes to create the basic requirement for example, energy, cell biomass and enzymes to degrade the pollutant. All of them will need nitrogen, phosphorous and carbon [150]. The major contaminants that can be successfully remediated through biostimulation are petroleum hydrocarbons, sulphate and polyester polyurethanes [130,131].

The Beneficial Role of Microorganisms in Different Pollutant
Waste Types
Role of Microorganisms in Heavy Metal Bioremediation

Heavy metals are environmental contaminants globally. They have polluted agricultural soils and caused detrimental effects on our ecosystem. Heavy metals at certain concentrations can have long-term toxic effects within ecosystems and have a clear negative influence on biologically mediated soil processes [120]. Toxic effects of heavy metals have been reported in plants, animals, humans, and microorganisms. There is more than 20 heavy metals, only few of them such as Cadmium (Cd), Cupper (Cu), Argon (Ar), Silver (Ag), Chromium (Cr), Zinc (Zn), Lead (Pb), Uranium (Ur), Ra, Nickel (Ni) etc. is considered due to their toxicity potential [237]. Heavy metal stress poses severe threats to agricultural crops by inhibiting plant growth parameters and yield as documented by many researchers [41,66, 81,114, 125]. The non-biodegradable nature of metals enhances their availability and longevity in soils. The longer persistence of metals in soils causes carcinogenic and mutagenic effects and becomes part of our food chain [3, 5]. Heavy metal concentrations above the threshold limit also causes also disturbances in microbial activity and soil health [80]. Generally neurological disorders, Parkinson, Alzheimer, depression, schizophrenia, cancer, poor nutrition, lack of hormones balance, obesity, abortion, respiratory and cardiovascular disease, damage in organs (liver, kidneys and brain), anorexia , arthritis, hair loss, osteoporosis and death (in severe cases) are adverse effects of heavy metals in the human body are researched by many scholrs [238]. For instance Cr (VI) by inhalation, may include irritating respiratory effects, possible circulatory effects, effects on stomach and blood, liver and kidney effects, and increased risk of death from lung cancer. Chromium in its hexavalent form is carcinogenic and the permissible limit is 0.05 ppm [144]. Hexavalent chromium is in general more toxic to organisms in the environment [182]. Inhalation and ingestion of Arsenic, Lead, Nickel Cadmium and Mercury cause irritation of respiratory system, Liver and Kidney damage, Loss of appetite, loss of hearing and muscle coordination, nausea and vomiting [8]. There are different report in microorganisms are important in heavy metal remediation highly efficient even at low metal concentrations. Vibrio harveyi, a normal inhabitant of the saline environment, is reported to possess the potential for bioaccumulation of cadmium up to 23.3 mg Cd 2+/1g of dry cells. A reported a consortium of marine bacteria to efficiently remove mercury in a bioreactor in a disturbance-independent mechanism [23]. A new combination of genetic systems in bacteria for the potential degradation of phenol and heavy metals was also described. Bacteria also possess the properties of chelation of heavy metals, thus removing them from the contaminated environment by the secretion of exopolysaccharides which have been evident from the reports of a marine bacterium Enterobacter cloaceae [92]. This bacterium has been reported to chelate up to 65% of cadmium, 20% copper, and 8% cobalt at 100mg/L of metal concentration. In line with that, certain purple nonsulfur bacterial isolates, e.g., Rhodobium marinum and Rhodobacter sphaeroides, have also been found to possess the potential of removing heavy metals like copper, zinc, cadmium, and lead from the contaminated environments either by biosorption or biotransformation. Thus, the bacteria have been designated for assessing pollution through their tolerance and biosorption of heavy metals. However, the genetic mechanisms of bioremediation towards toxic metals have been reduced for a smaller number of bacteria. For instance, Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been used to alleviate Zn and Cu stress [101]. Moreover, symbiotic association between plants and rhizobacteria efficiently improve plant growth by increasing mineral nutrition and alleviating heavy metal toxicity on target plants [222]. However, many mechanisms are adopted by plants to combat heavy metals. Fungi are known to tolerate and detoxify metals by several mechanisms including valence transformation, extra and intracellular precipitation and active uptake [59].

Mechanism of Microbial Detoxification of Heavy Metal

Microorganisms adopt different mechanisms to interact and survive in the presence of inorganic metals. Various mechanisms used by microbes to survive metal toxicity are biotransformation, extrusion, use of enzymes, production of exo-polysaccharide (EPS) and synthesis of metallothioneins [86,132] (Fig1 &Table 1). The mechanism involves several procedures, together with electrostatic interaction, ion exchange, precipitation, redox process, and surface complexation [209]. The major mechanical means to resist heavy metals by microorganism are metal oxidation, methylation, enzymatic decrease, metal-organic complexion, metal decrease, metal ligand degradation, metal flux pumps, demethylation, intracellular and extracellular metal sequestration, exclusion by permeability barrier, and production of metal chelators like metallothioneins and bio surfactants [106]. Detoxification mechanisms involved in fungi are different from eukaryotes [20]. Extracellular mechanisms involved are chelation, precipitation, and cell wall binding. Intercellular mechanisms include binding to sulfur compounds, organic acids, peptides, polyphosphates, and transport into intracellular compartments [20].

Bio sorption mechanisms

Biosorbation is the metal cations sorbed to negatively charge bacterial cell surface. The uptake of heavy metals by microbial cells through bio-sorption mechanisms can be classified into metabolismindependent bio-sorption, which mostly occurs on the cells exterior and metabolism-dependent bioaccumulation, which comprises sequestration, redox reaction, and species-transformation methods [67,234]. Bio-sorption can be carried out by dead biomass or living cells as passive uptake through surface complexation onto the cell wall and surface layers [52]. Bioaccumulation depends on a variety of chemical, physical, and biological mechanisms and these factors are intracellular and extracellular processes, where bio-sorption plays a limited and ill-defned role [52].

Intracellular Sequestration

Intracellular sequestration is the complexation of metal ions by various compounds in the cell cytoplasm. The concentration of metals within microbial cells can result from interaction with surface ligands followed by slow transport into the cell. The ability of bacterial cells to accumulate metals intracellular has been exploited in practices, predominantly in the treatment of effluent treatment. Intracellular sequestration of heavy metal like Copper, Cadmium and Zinc ions with the help of cysteine rich low molecular weight proteins [76]. The rigid cell wall of fungi is made up of chitin, mineral ions, lipids, nitrogencontaining polysaccharide, polyphosphates, and proteins. They can decontaminate metal ions by energetic uptake, extracellular and intracellular precipitation, and valence conversion, with several fungi accumulating metals to their mycelium and spores.

Extracellular Sequestration

Extracellular sequestration is the accumulation of metal ions by cellular components in the periplasm or complexation of metal ions as insoluble compounds. Cop0per-resistant Pseudomonas syringae strains produced copper-inducible proteins CopA, CopB (periplasmicproteins), and CopC (outer membrane protein) which bind copper ions and microbial colonies [24]. Another example of extracellular sequestration is metal precipitation as insoluble complexes. Sulfate-reducing bacteria generate large amounts of hydrogen sulfide that causes precipitation of a number of metal cations [126,247]. Klebsiella planticola strain produced hydrogen sulfide from thiosulfate under anaerobic conditions and precipitated cadmium ions as insoluble sulfides [199].

Methylation of Metals

Methylation increases metal toxicity as a result of increased lipophilicity and thus increased permeation across cell membranes. Microbial methylation plays a significant function in metal remediation. Methylated compounds are regularly explosive; for instance, Hg (II) can be bio methylated by some bacteria such as Bacillus spp., Escherichia spp., Clostridium spp., and Pseudomonas spp. to gaseous methyl mercury. Bio methylation of selenium (Se) to volatile dimethyl selenide and arsenic (As) to gaseous arsines as well as lead (Pb) to dimethyl lead was witnessed in polluted top soil [177].

Reduction of Heavy Metal Ions by Microbial Cell

Microbial cells can convert metal ion from one oxidation state to another, hence reducing their harmfulness [99]. Bacteria use metals and metalloids as electron donors or acceptors for energy generation. Metals in the oxidized form could serve as terminal acceptors of electrons during anaerobic respiration of bacteria. Reduction of metal ions through enzymatic activity could result in formation of less toxic form of mercury and chromium [19,232]. Direct enzymatic reduction (metal ion are reduced during the oxidation of orgnics). In direct enzymatic reduction (metal ion get reduced during Fe or S oxidation process).

Active Transport of Metal Ions (Efflux)

Active transport or efflux is one of the mechanisms where microorganism heavy metal resistance systems. Bacteria exploit these systems to export metal ions from cells. Genetic determinants of efflux systems can be localized on chromosomes [58,120,251] and on plasmids [62,158]. Some metal ions can enter the cell through the systems responsible for the uptake of essential elements for example, chromate is transported inside the cell via sulphate transportsystem [30], ions of cadmium, zinc, cobalt, nickel and manganese enter the cells of Ralstonia metallidurans (Alcaligenes eutrophus) using systems of magnesium transport [154] ATP hydrolysis [16] or electrochemical gradient [154] are used to export metal ionsfrom the cell. Efflux systems contain proteins belonging to three families: RND (resistance, nodulation, cell division, CDF (cation diffusion facilitator) and P-typeATPases.Ptype ATPases and CDF proteins of gram-negative bacteria transport specific substrates through the plasma membrane into the periplasm. It should be noted that PtypeATPases predominantly transfermetalions with high affinity for sulfhydryl groups (Cu+/ Ag+Zn2+/Cd2+/Pb2+) while CDF-proteins specifically interact with ions of divalent metals (Zn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cd2+ and Fe2+). Next transport complexes formed by RND proteins transport cations from the periplasm across the plasma membrane [154].

img

Figure 1: Metal-Processing Features of Bacteria Required To Utilize In Bioremediation

Table1: Some microorganisms involved in heavy metal detoxification
Heavy metals Sources Heavy metal degrader References
Cr Tanneries, steel industries, flying ash from the burning of coal Pseudomonas mendoca,Cellulosmicrobium cellula
ns,Oedogoniumrivulare,Saccharomyces cerevisiae,
Oscillatoria sp., Arthrobacter sp., Agrobacter
sp.,Pseudomonas aeruginosa S128, Chlamydomonas
sp. (algae), Chlorella
vulgaris (algae), Zoogloea ramigera
[105,98,33,100,175]
Pb Herbicides, batteries, insecticides,
aerial emissions from petrol
Pseudomonasaeruginosa,Oedogonium rivulare, Saccharomyces cerevisiae [33,248,98]
Hg Medical waste, coal burning, and Au-Ag mining Trichoderma Viride, And Humicola
InsolensSaccharomycescerevisiae, Pseudomonas sp.,
Escherichia sp., Bacillus sp., Clostridium sp.
[248,133,170]
Ni Battery manufacturing, steel
alloys, kitchen
appliances, surgical instruments,
industrial effluents
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Oedogonium rivulare [224,33,226]
Cu Pesticides and fertilizers usage Bascillus species, Pseudomonas aeruginosav [105,167]
Cd Electroplating, plastic burning,
phosphate fertilizer, paints and
pigments
Bascillus species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Micrococus roseus [167,171,33]
As Wood storage and pesticides Bacillus spp. [225]
Zn Priming paints for metals,
varnishes and pigments in
aerospace paints.
Escherichia coli, Aspergillus niger [69,227]

Dye Stuff Pollution and Role of Microorganisms in Dyes Remediation

A dye is an organic compound containing both auxochrome and chromophore groups linked to benzene group. The history of dyeing can be divided into two great periods, the “preaniline”, extending to 1856and the “post-aniline” period. Following these early syntheses, numerous azo dyes have been made and it is estimated that over 2,000 are in use. Of all the different types of dyes, azo dyes are the most useful and widely used colorants which accounts for 50% of all the industrial dyes produced worldwide. Azo dyes and several other groups of dyes are recalcitrant to conventional wastewater treatments and persist in the environment. Worldwide 100,000 types of textile dyes with an estimated of 7x105 metric tonns are annually produced currently [15,184,210]. 10-25% of total textile dyes are lost during the dyeing process, and 2-20% of dyes are directly discharged as aqueous effluents in different environmental components. A large number of synthetic dyes with specific groups (azo, base, acid, triphenylmethane, anthracene etc) are widely used in textile, pharmaceutical, food, leather and cosmetic industries [32,156]. The residual dyes from different source such as textile industries, cosmetics, paper mills, pulp industries, dyeing and dye intermediates and bleaching industries, more than 80,000 tons of dyes and pigments are produced in these industries. The effluent which is untreated is one of the major sources of consumed metal dyes, phenol, aromatic amines [103,211,174]. Several aromatic amines are source of mutagens and carcinogens to human beings. These dyes can also affect the human health by causing nausea, ulceration of the skin, gastrointestinal tract, hemorrhagic and severe damage to reproductive system, kidney, liver, brain and central nervous system [212,242]. Many of the synthetic Azo dyes and their metabolites are toxic mutagenic and carcinogenic [147]. Azo dyes are reduced in mammals to carcinogenic aromatics, which are oxidized to N-hydroxy derivatives and finally give rise to electrophiles capable of forming covalent linkages with DNA amines. Several numbers of microbes involved in bioremediation of different class of dye. P. chrysosporium has been reported to decolorize azo dyes, Congo red, Orange II and Tropaeolin [34]. Flavodonflavus, a basidiomycete isolated from the coastal marine environment, produces laccases, MnPs, and LiPs, and that efficiently degrades the dyes poly R, poly B, azure B. Pleurotus eryngii was reported to be involved in the decolorization of the industrial dyes Reactive Violet 5, Reactive Black 5, Reactive Orange 96, Reactive Red 198 and Reactive Blue 38 and 15 [74]. Gloeocapsa pleurocapsoides and Phormidium ceylanicum decolorized Acid Red 97 and FF sky Blue dye more than 80% after 26 days. (Table2).

Microbial Mode of Action in Degradation of the Complex Dye Structure

Both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria have different mechanisms of degradation. Enzymes play the key role in these biotransformation mechanisms. Oxidizing enzymes such as LiP, veratryl alcohol oxidase, laccase, and tyrosinase are well known to degrade textile dyes. However, reducing enzymes such as azo reductase, riboflavin reductases, DCIP reductase, and Green HE4B reductase also break the complex dye structures [200]. Peroxidases in particular, catalyze phenolic substrates result in in radical formation by using hydrogen peroxide as the electron donor. Versatile peroxidases (VP) can oxidize not only Mn but also phenolic and nonphenolic aromatic compounds including dyes [74, 75]. Laccase is a coppercontaining oxidase enzyme which performs oxidation of a wide range of organic pollutant substrates such as phenols, polyphenols, and anilines as well as highly recalcitrant environmental pollutants on the basis of a one-electron transfer mechanism [168, 185, 249]. Laccase couples the oxidation of substituted phenolic and nonphenolic chemical moieties with oxygen as an electron acceptor to form free radicals.These free radicals further undergo demethylation, depolymerization, repolymerization or quinoneformation [186].

Table 2: Dye Degrder Microorganisms
Classification of Dye Dye degrader Reference
Based on chemical structure
Azodye dye P. rettgeri, Pseudomonas sp, Paenibacillus
polymyxa, Micrococcusluteus,
Micrococcussp. as Bacillus vallismortis,
Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus
subtilis and Bacillus megaterium, Daphnia
magna, Exiguobacterium indicum,
Exiguobacterium aurantiacums, Bacillus
cereus andAcinetobacter baumanii.
[148,228,50,55,221]
Metal complex azo dye
Anthraquione dye Pseudomonassp, Shewanellasp., Aeromonas
sp. Rhodococcus sp.Klebsiella sp.
[54,238,178,181,241]
Phthalocyamine dye Phanerochaete chrysosporium [12]
Triphenodioxazine Trametes hir suta , Pleur otus
pulmonarius ECS-0190, Bjerkander aadusta
[73,104]
Formazon dye Bjerkander a adusta , Pleur otusostr eatus [94]
Based on usage/application
Disperse dye P. chrysosporium [202]
Direct dye P. chrysosporium [161]
Sulphure dye Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans [220]
Acid dye T. versicolor, Coriolopsis polyzona;
Perenniporia ochroleuca; Perenniporia
tephropora, Pycnoporus sanguineus.
[243]
Vat dye Bacillus firmus, Bacillus macerans,
Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella
oxytoca
[9]

Pesticide Pollution and Role of Microorganisms in Pesticide Bioremediation

Pesticide is substance intended for preventing, destroying, attracting, repelling or controlling any pest including unwanted species of plants or animals during production, storage, transport, distribution and processing of food, agricultural commodities or animal feeds or which may be administered to the animals for the control of ectoparasites. Pesticides are used in areas of agriculture, horticulture, fish farming, forestry, homes and gardens, food and commodity storage, animal husbandry, etc for pest control. Globally, the use of synthetic pesticides has increased rapidly in the last fifty years due to intensification of farming in order to obtain higher yields [236]. More than 55% of the land used for agricultural production in developing countries uses about 26% of the total pesticides produced in the world. Pesticides are necessary to protect crops and losses that may amount to about 45% of total food production worldwide [44]. About one third of the world‘s agricultural production is lost every year due to pests despite the pesticide consumption which is more than two million tons. Excess fertilizer, herbicides and pesticides when washed by rain into rivers causes serious danger to life. Excess phosphorus in fertilizer causing severs eutrophication. 98% of the pesticides imported were classified as acutely toxic for fish and crustaceans and 73% for amphibians. Organophosphorus poisoning is a global health problem with around 3 million poisonings and 200000 deaths annually [110,194]. Pesticides are problematic because they are designed to be persistent (for long-lasting action), and many are lipophilic often accumulating in animal‘s fatty tissue through food webs. The pesticides can be classified in many ways on the basis of use, toxicity, mode of entry, mode of action, chemistry and formulations. Classification based on the basis of use can be group as Acaricides, Algicide, Antifeedants, Avicides, Bactericides, Bird repellents, Chemosterillant, Fungicides, Herbicide softeners,Herbicides, Insect attractants, Insect repellents, Insecticides, Mammal repellents, Mating disrupters, Molluscicides, Nematicides, Plant activators, Plant growth regulators, Rodenticides, Synergists, Virucides and Miscellaneous. Pesticides can also be broadly classified according to their intended target pest and also by their chemical structure and properties in the form of fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, nematicides, rodenticides, fumigants, disinfectants, wood preservatives, and anti foliants. There are different classes of Pesticides. These are Organochlorine, Organophosphate, Carbamate, Pyrithroid, Thiocarbamates, Organotin, Di-nitrophenol [208]. Organochlorine pesticides group consists of, the polychlorinated derivatives of cyclohexane (Lindane), polychlorinated biphenyls (DDT, dicofol) and polychlorinated cyclodiene (Endosulfan). The effect of Organochlorine‘s in the environment is serious which can kill bees, pollination decline and the loss of bees that pollinate plants, and colony collapse disorder (CCD). A number of the Organochlorine pesticides have been banned from most uses worldwide, and globally they are controlled via the Stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants. (POP‘s) Organochlorine pesticide include: aldrin, chlordane, DDT, dihedron, endrin,heptachlor, mirex and toxaphene.High level of DDT and its metabolites have been detected a human adipose tissues, blood plasma, liver, brain, placenta and even in breast milk. It is reported to be a potential endocrine disruptor in both avian and mammals. Resulting egg shell thinning, impaired male reproductive ability, interference with sex hormone, causes cancer and other nervous disease [25]. Organophosphorus (OP) pesticides are another class of broad-spectrum insecticide used on a wide range of crops including vegetables, fruits, grains and ornamentals. They are designed to kill or repel pests but may be harmful and fatal to other organisms, including humans. Exhibits acute extreme toxicity to slight toxicity (Phorate1.5 to 3.7 mg/Kg, temephos 8600mg/Kg). LD50 values may change with the purity of the compound. This Pesticide contributes significantly to cancer mortality [254]. Organophosphorus (OP) pesticides all act by inhibiting the nervous system enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and as such are termed anticholinesterase insecticides [88]. The adverse short-term effects of exposure to these mchemicals have been studied mostly in the nervous system, which is the main target [60,61]. The majority of people are continually exposed to low OP concentrations, and long- term epidemiologic studies reveal linkage to higher risk of cancer development [22,245]. Organophosphates group was responsible for admission millions of people to hospitals with accidental poisoning, in addition to suicidal cases. Meanwhile, it was estimated that about 25 million agricultural workers suffering from poisoning every year inthe third world countries [4]. Some commonly used organophosphates include monocrotophos, phosphamidon, methylparathion, fenitrothion, Phosphorothiates oxy demeton methyl, dimethoate, phorate, Phosalone, DDVP, Malathion, methyl parathion, chlorpyrifos, and diazinon. N-methyl carbamates are often grouped together with Organophosphoruss because they act similarly. Which is active against a relatively narrower range of target organisms than the organophosphates, but they are highly toxic to such beneficial insects as honeybees. Common N-methyl carbamates include aldicarb and carbaryl [68, 204]. The other types of insecticide are synthetic pyrethroid which used primarily in structural pest control and agriculture, function much like organochlorines. However they are fairly short-lived in the environment and are less acutely toxic to humans. The toxicity of these chemicals ranges from 80 to 4000mg/Kg body weight and toxicity varies with the ratio of isomers and test animals/ species. Toxicity to the insects can be increased by synergists (e.g. Piperonyl butoxide, sesamex) (9:1) Typical pyrethroids include permethrin, cypermethrin, cyfluthrin, lambda-cyhalothrin). Cypermethrin is a synthetic pyrethroid insecticide that has high insecticidal activity, low avian and mammalian toxicity, and adequate stability in air and light. It is used to control many pests including lepidopterous pests of cotton, fruit and vegetable crops and is available as an emulsifiable concentrate or wettable powder [109]. Emamectin benzoate is a salt with benzoic acid is widely used in controlling lepidopeterous pests and sea lice.Thiamethoxam is also considered as moderately hazardous to human as it is harm as it is harmful if swallowed. It is nontoxic to fish and algea, mildly toxic to birds and highly toxic to midges and bees [53]. The current study involves use of three Endosulfan, Chlorpyrifos and Cypermethrin insecticide widely used in pest control of crops including cereals, fruit, oil seeds, potato, tea and vegetables. For example the Pesticide Registration Council of Ethiopia has registered a total of 171 pesticides consisting of 86 insecticides, 45 herbicides, 22 fungicides and 18 miscellaneous groups [217]. Of these, 159 are currently in use. The largest proportion of pesticide use in Ethiopia has been for the control of bollworms and other pests such as the cotton aphid and the cotton whitefly in cotton. Horticultural crops such as vegetables and fruits have also become heavy users of pesticides in recent years [151]. Various studies suggested that a wide range of microorganisms are capable of degrading pesticides. Most notable among the pesticide degrading bacteria are Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Flavobacterium, Alcaligenes, Arthrobacter [96]. Several fungi such as Agrocybesemiorbicularis, Auricularia auricula, Coriolus versicolor, Dichomitus squalens, Flammulina velupites, Hypholoma fasciculare, Pleurotus ostreatus, Stereum hirsutum, and Avatha discolor have shown their ability to degrade various pesticide groups like phenylamide, triazine, phenylurea, dicarboximide, chlorinated and organophosphorus compounds [11]. Microbes which were commonly reported in pesticides bioremediation include Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp, Klebsiella sp, Pandoraea sp, Phanerochaete Chrysosporium, Mycobacterium sp. Agrocybe semiorbicularis, Auricularia auricula, Coriolus versicolor, Dichomitus squalens, Flammulina velupites, Hypholoma fasciculare, Pleurotus ostreatus, Stereum hirsutum, and Avatha discolour [29]. These microorganisms have shown their ability to degrade various pesticide groups like phenylamide, triazine, phenylurea, and dicarboximide, chlorinated and organophosphorus compounds. Several classes of pesticides such as lindane, atrazine, diuron, terbuthylazine, metalaxyl, DDT, gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (g-HCH), dieldrin, aldrin, heptachlor, chlordane, lindane, mirex, etc. have been degraded to different extent by white-rot fungi [172] (Table 3).

Table 3: Pecticide Degrsder Icroorganisms
Pesticide Microorganism Reference
Organochlorine class
DDT Alcaligeneseutrophus, Aerobacter
aerogenes,Sphingobacterium sp,Penicillium
miczynskii, Aspergillus sydowii,
Trichoderma sp., Penicillium raistrickii,
Aspergillus sydowii and Bionectria
sp.Aerobacter aerogenes, Trichoderma
viridae, Pseudomonas sp., Micrococcus sp.,
Arthrobacter sp., Bacillus sp,Pseudomonas
sp.Sphingobacterium sp.P. Chrysosporium
Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogens.,
Enterobacter cloacae., Klebsiella
pneumonia.Pseudomonas putida. Bacillus
species.Hydrogenomonas.Saccharomyces
cervisiae.,Phanerochaete chrysosporium.
Trichoderma viridae.Serratia marcescens
DT-1P
[14,48, 115,157,159,164, 165,246,]
Endosulfan Aspergillus terreus, Bacillus sp.,
Cheatosartorea stromatoides,Cladosporium
oxysporum, Fusarium,ventricosum, Klebsiella
oxytoca KE-8,Klebsiella pneumoniae KE1, Myco-bacterium sp. ESD,Pandoraea
sp.,Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Pseudomonas
spinosa, Pseudomonas,cepacia
[82,193,214,189,116,136].
Aldrin, lindane Bacillus sp., Exiguobacterium,aurantiacum,
Pandoraea sp.,Pseudomonas
pseudoalcaligenes
[160,91]
Organophosphorus class
Cadusafos,dichlorovosethoprophos,fenami
phos,malathion,methyl-parathion,parathion,
phospho-midon, quinolphos,Chlorpyrifos
Acinetobacter radioresistens,Arthrobacter
sp., Aulosira fertilissima,ARM 68,
Flavobacterium sp., Fusa-rium
oxysporum, Nostoc muscorum,ARM221,
Pseudomonas -putida (epI),Sphingomonas
paucimobilis,Enterobactersp., Klebsiella
sp.,Alcaligenes faecalis
[84,108,113,213,215, 216,253]
Carbofuran Novosphingobium sp. [252]
Carbamate Aldicarb Rotylenchulus reniformis [139]
Dieldrin Pseudomonas sp [127]
1,4- Dichlorobenzene Pseudomonas sp.Sphingomonas paucimobilis [201]
Lindane Pleurotus ostreatus, Streptomyces
sp,Ganodermaaustrale
[17,180]
DDD Trichoderma sp [159]
Heptachlor epoxide Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Phlebia sp [7, 250]
Heptachlor O Bjerkandera sp,Trichoderma viridae,
Pseudomonas sp., Micrococcus sp., Bacillus
sp
[165]
Aldrin O Pseudomonas sp. 105 [165]
Chlorpyrifos Enterobacter sp. Enterobacter aerogenes,
Escherichia coli, and Kleibsiella pneumonia
[188,117]
Malathion Bacillus Thuringiensis, Pseudomonas putida [57, 128,129]
Heptachlor and lindane P. chrysosporium,, P. eryngi, Pleurotus florida
and Pleurotus sajor-caju.
[7]
Synthetic-pyrethroid pesticides
Allethrin, beta-cyfluthrin, cyper-methrin,
flumethrin,permethrin
Acidomonas sp., Aspergillus
niger,Pseudomonas sp.,
Pseudomonas,stutzeri, Serratia sp.,
[60,118,163,196]
Fungicides
Pentachlorophenol Pseudomonas sp. [239]
Herbicides
2,4-D Pseudomonas sp. [146]
Alachlor Streptomyces capoamus, Streptomyces galbus, Streptomycesbikiniensis,
Streptomyces taxa
[187]

Microorganisms in Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Chlorinated Compound Bioremediation

Petroleum hydrocarbons comprise a diverse group of compounds, including alkanes, alkenes, and heterocyclic and aromatic constituents. Another important group of pollutants are the poly nuclear aromatic hydro carbons (PAHs), which are commonly found near coal conversion facilities and petroleum plants [135] short-chain alkanes tend to be volatile and are readily stripped from groundwater whereas mono aromatic hydro carbons such as benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes (which are collectively known as BTEX) tend to be relatively soluble and are transported over longer distances by groundwater. PAHs are the principal constituents of creosote, which is a complex mixture of about 200 compounds also containing phenolic and heterocyclic. Chlorinated aliphatic and aromatic compounds make up an important group of organic pollutants that are both ubiquitous and relatively persistent in aquifers. Common volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the chlorinated solvents group include tetra chloro ethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, and vinyl chloride or chloroethylene. All of these VOCs are potential carcinogens. Groundwater contamination by 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) and chlorinated methanes, such as carbon tetrachloride (CCl4 ) and chloroform (CHCl3 ), is also common. Chlorinated solvents generally have higher specific gravity than water and tend to sink to the bottom of the aquifer if present in a separate organic phase. Crude oil is the most important organic pollutant in the environment, as 1.7-8.8 3X 106 tonnes of petroleum hydrocarbons are being released to the marine and estuarine environments annually [137]. Petroleum-based products are the major source of energy for industry and daily life. Leaks and accidental spills occur regularly during the exploration, production, refining, transport, and storage of petroleum and petroleum products. Release of hydrocarbons into the environment whether accidentally or due to human activities is a main cause of water and soil pollution [78]. Soil contamination with hydrocarbons causes‘ extensive damage of local system since accumulation of pollutants in animals and plant tissue may cause death or mutations [1]. The technology commonly used for the soil remediation includes mechanical, burying, evaporation, dispersion, and washing. However, these technologies are expensive and can lead to incomplete decomposition of contaminants. Biodegradation by natural populations of microorganisms represents one of the primary mechanisms by which petroleum and other hydrocarbon pollutants can be removed from the environment and is cheaper than other remediation technologies [123, 231]. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons is a complex process that depends on the nature and on the amount of the hydrocarbons present. Petroleum hydrocarbons can be divided into four classes: the saturates, the aromatics, the asphaltenes (phenols, fatty acids, ketones, esters, and porphyrins), and the resins (pyridines, quinolines, carbazoles, sulfoxides, and amides [35]. Bacteria are the most active agents in petroleum degradation, and they work as primary degraders of spilled oil in environment [18,173]. Several bacteria are even known to feed exclusively on hydrocarbons [223]. Acinetobacter sp. was found to be capable of utilizing n-alkanes of chain lengthC10‑C8 as a sole source of carbon [223]. Bacterial genera, namely, Gordonia, Brevibacterium, Aeromicrobium, Dietzia, Burkholderia, and Mycobacterium isolated from petroleum contaminated soil proved to be the potential organisms for hydrocarbon degradation [27]. The degradation of poly aromatic hydrocarbons by Sphingomonas was reported by Daugulis and McCracken [36]. Some novel marine bacterial species like Cycloclasticus spirillensus, Lutibacterium anuloederans, and Neptunomonas naphthovorans have also been utilized in enhanced biodegradationof PAHs in a marine environment [31]. Similarly, Achromobacter denitrificans, Bacillus cereus, Corynebacterium renale, Cyclotrophicus sp., Moraxella sp., Mycobacterium sp., Burkholderia cepacia, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas paucimobilis, P. putida, Brevundimonasvesicularis, Comamonas testosteroni, Rhodococcus sp., Streptomyces sp., and Vibrio sp. have been isolated from marine resources and are capable of degrading naphthalene by the process of mineralization. (Table 4) However, bacteria belonging to the genus Cycloclasticus play the major role in biodegradation of hydrocarbons. Bacterial isolates like Sphingomonas paucimobilis EPA505 have been found to utilize fluoranthene as their sole carbon source. Some of the important genera of bacteria that are capable of degrading petroleum oil include Acinetobacter, Marinococcus, Methylobacterium, Micrococcus, Nocardia, Planococcus, and Rhodococcus. In terms of commercial applications, a consortium has been developed by [39] by using Arctic bacteria like Agreia, Marinobacter, Pseudoalteromonas, Pseudomonas, Psychrobacter, and Shewanella for significant degradation of crude oil and its components.

Mechanism of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Degradation

The most rapid and complete degradation of the majority of organic pollutants is brought about under aerobic conditions. It is main principle of aerobic degradation of hydrocarbons [51]. The initial intracellular attack of organic pollutant is an oxidative process and the activation as well as incorporation of oxygen is the enzymatic key reaction catalyzed by oxygenases and peroxidases. The tricarboxylic acid cycle. Biosynthesis of cell biomass occurs from the central precursor metabolites, for example, acetyl-CoA, succinate, pyruvate. Sugars required for various bio syntheses and growth is synthesized by gluconeogenesis. The degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons can be mediated by specific enzyme system. Other mechanisms involved are (1) attachment of microbial cells to the substrates and (2) production of biosurfactants [77]. The uptake mechanism linked to the attachment of cell to oil droplet is still unknown but production of biosurfactants has been well studied. In microorganisms such P450 multiplicity can only be found in few species [257]. Cytochrome P450 enzyme systems was found to be involved in biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons (Fig 2). Bacteria are the most active agents in petroleum degradation, and they work as primary degraders of spilled oil in environment [18,173].

img

Figure 2: Main Principle of Aerobic Degradation of Hydrocarbons by Microorganisms

Table 4: Hydrocarbon Degrading Microorgansms
Hydrocarbon Substrates Enzymes Microorganisms References
C1‑C8 alkanes alkenes and cycloalkanes Soluble Methane Monooxygenases Methylococcus,Methylosinus Methylocystis,Methylomonas Methylocella [134]
C1‑C5 (halogenated) alkanes and cycloalkanes5 Particulate Methane Monooxygenases Methylobacter,Methylococcus, Methylocystis [134]
C5‑C16 alkanes, fatty acids, alkyl benzenes, cycloalkanes and so forth AlkB related Alkane Hydroxylases Pseudomonas,Burkholderia Rhodococcus,Mycobacterium [97]
C10‑C16alkanes, fatty acids Eukaryotic P450 Candida maltose, Candida tropicalis, Yarrowialipolytica [83]
C5‑C16alkanes, cycloalkanes Bacterial P450 oxygenase system Cinetobacter,Caulobacter Mycobacterium [233]
C10‑C30 alkanes Dioxygenases Acinetobacter sp [138]

The Role of Microbes in Domestic and Agricultural Lignocellulos Wastes Remediation

In nature, lignocellulose is derived from wood, grass, agricultural residues, forestry wastes, and solid municipal wastes. Lignocellulosic complex contains three types of polymers approximately 40 to 60% cellulose, 20 to 40% hemicellulose, and 10 to 25% lignin. Contaminated soil is removed from the ground and mixed with natural materials such as cow manure, activated sludge, and corn cobs. These additives provide the biomass necessary for microbial growth and worm growth. Each year, human, livestock, and crops by product produce approximately 38 billion metric tons of organic waste worldwide [56]. Hydrolytic enzyme producing microorganisms play an important role in the recycling of agricultural wastes. Especially cellulase, lacase, lignin peroxidase, manganese peroxidase, hemicellulase enzyme are vitally important in degaradation of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin containing agricultural waste. Composting is one of the bioremediation method where the compost generated by bioconversion of agro residues offers several benefits such as enhanced soil fertility and soil health which can lead to increased agricultural productivity, improved soil biodiversity, reducing ecological risks and a healthier environment. These virtues make composting an ideal option for processing of the enormous quantities of agro wastes that are generated in the world. Composting is the biological degradation and stabilization of organic substrate under conditions that allow development of thermophilic temperature as a result of biologically produced heat [64]. During composting, mesophilic population builds up initially by the utilization of simple nutrients, which raises the temperature of the piles. Thermophilic microbes proliferate in the second phase. The final product is stable, free of pathogens and plant seeds and can be beneficially applied to land. Composting is essentially a microbiological phenomenon that depends highly on temperature fluctuation within the windrows. The temperature within a composting mass determines the rate at which many of the biological processes take place and plays a selective role on the evolution and the succession of the microbiological communities [152]. In biological terms the operating temperature ranges are as follows: > 55°C to maximize sanitation, 45-55°C to maximize the biodegradation rate, and 35-40°C to maximize microbial diversity [207]. During aerobic composting, the average temperature curve within the piles showed three classic phases. Generally, composting proceeds through three phase: 1) mesophilic (moderate temperature phase), 2) thermophilic (high temperature phase) and 3) cooling and maturation phase. Mesophilic phase, Psychrophilic and mesophilic microorganisms in waste piles tended to increase during the first 25 days of the composting cycle. During this phase, the temperature increased to reach 40 to 50°C as a consequence of biodegradation of organic compounds [2, 152]. Thermophilic phase: This important step occurred between days 30 to 110 of the composting process, during which the temperature exceed the tolerance limit of mesophilic microorganisms and promoted development of thermogenic microorganisms. According to [207] temperatures above 55°C are important to maximize sanitization. Meanwhile, temperature between 45 and 55°C are to improve the degradation rate and between 35 and 40°C to increase microbial diversity. Control of the temperature and its maintenance below 65°C inside the windrow during composting is assured by ventilation and watering. As mentioned by [70 &145] temperatures above 60°C affect seriously the decomposition rate of the waste organic matter as a result of microbiological activity lowering. In Cooling phase, microbial activity slows down and as the process nears completion, the material approaches ambient air temperature. Finished compost takes on many of the characteristics of humus, the organic fraction of soil. The material will have been reduced in volume by 20 to 60%, the moisture content by 40% and the weight by up to 50%. One of the key challenges in composting is to retain as much nitrogen as possible. Composting may contribute to the greenhouse effect because carbon dioxide (CO2 ), methane (NH4 ) and nitrous oxide (NO2 ) will be emitted to the atmosphere during composting. During the curing phase the need for turning is greatly reduced. However, there is still a need for low levels of oxygen for microbial activity. Therefore, it is necessary to construct curing piles and/or windrows to a size that will allow for passive airflow through the windrow. A recommended size for a curing pile is 1.5 meters tall and 3-4 meters wide. During the curing phase, the windrows should be kept in dry areas, away from excess moisture. Exposure to excess moisture during this phase may cause the curing piles to become anaerobic. The temperature began to decrease after the twelfth week. This decrease resulted in a beginning of depletion of organic matters; during this phase the C/N ratio in the different windrows tended to stabilize by the end of the 4th month of composting, average temperatures inside the different windrows marked a real fall with values of approximately 30°C. The temperature remained low in spite of the watering and the turning of windrows. Composting has been used as a means of disposal of organic wastes like paddy straw, sugarcane trash and other agricultural wastes. Natural succession of microflora takes place during composting. Several fungi like Trichoderma harzianum, Pleurotus ostreatus, Polyporus ostriformis and Phanerochaete chrysosporium are known to play important role in composting of lignocellulosic materials [203]. Though fungi, bacteria and actinomycetes play unique and important roles during composting, mixed cultures of microorganisms enhance the rate of lignocellulose degradation due to their synergistic activity through utilization of intermediate degradation products [112]. The consortium of four hypercellulolytic fungal cultures namely Aspergillus nidulans, Trichoderma viride, Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Aspergillus awamori were used for compostingof paddy straw in perforated pits. Thermophilic fungal consortium of A. nidulans, Scytalidium thermophiluma and Humicola sp. wasfound highly effective in degradadion of soybean trash and paddy straw mixture during summer months [111]. Similarly a consortium of thermophilic microorganisms Scytalidium thermophilum, Humicola insolens and Sporotrichum thermophilumare also being used. The contaminants may be degraded using different mechanisms like mineralization by microbial activity, transformation to non-toxic products, volatilization, and formation of humus and inert by products, such as carbon dioxide, water and salts. The critical parameters and efficiency of compost in bioremediation is essentially determined by process parameters like pH, temperature, C: N ratio, moisture content and recalcitrance of the material to be composted. Bulking agents like peat moss, pine wood shavings, bran flakes accelerate composting by favoring the growth of aerobic microorganisms [6, 149,166] (Table.5)

Table 5: Composting Microorganisms
Composting phase Microorganisms Reference
1 Thermophilic phase(day 45) Curtobacteriumcitreum,Stenotrophomonas rhizophila,Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Microbacteriumfoliorum,Xanthom onas oryzae,Pseudoxanthomonas taiwanensis,Bacillus ginsengihumi,Serratia marcescens, Serratia odorifera Rhabditidae spp, Panagolamidae sp.Diplogasteridae Sp, Cephalobidae sp., Mononchoides sp., Ditylenchus filimus [79,191]
2 Mesophilic phase(day 139) Xenophilus azovorans,Bacillus licheniformis, Pseudomonas mendocina, Rhodococcus rhodochrous Bacillus sp., Paenibacillius sp, Actinomycetes, Aspergillus fumigatus , Feacal coliforms,Pseudomonas Sp,Streptococcus sp, Proteus Sp,Serratia Sp. [79, 192,219]
3 Psychophilic phase Asprgillus fumigatus, Emericella Sp,Aspergillus ochraceus,Aspergillus terreus, Penicillium oxalicum, Thermoactinomyces sp. Cladosporium sp, Mycotypha sp, Scopulariopsis sp, Coprinus sp,Cephalosporium sp,Trichotheclum sp., [37,79,219]

Conclusion

Environmental pollution due to different pollutant source from industry, agriculture and urbanization activities leads to ecological crise, biodiversity loss and drastic climate change. There are different waste removal strategies utilized to tackle these global problems till now. Acorrding to cost effectiveness and ecofriendly approach waste treatment and detoxifixation method seek optional and alternative approach. Bioremedition is an incremental technology using the potential of biological agent employed for eradiction of environmrntal pollutant and detoxification of hazardous toxic contaminnt. It has evolved over 20 years in use of commercial life and application in remediation service. Through exisitu and in situ bioremediation method like biopiling, composting, land frming, bioventing, biosparging, biostimulation, bioagumentation, are employed to treat heavy metal waste, hydrocbon petroleum, chlorinated compound and plastic waste, organic and volatile compound pollutant, organic and inorganic municipal solid waste, lignocellulose organic agricultural based waste, industry effluent waste, nuclear waste and different dyestuff and agrochemical waste like pesticide and fertilizer. Microrganisms produce versatile class of enzymes belonged in six class Oxidoreductases, Transferases, Hydrolases, Lyases, Isomerases and Ligases (synthetases) are used degradation and mineralization during bioremediation process. Understanding the mechanism, mode of action and role of microorgsnism in bioremediation process is essential to utilize microorganism potential and designe waste management strategy.

References

  1. Alvarezand PJJ, Vogel TM (1991) Substrate interactions of benzene, toluene, and para-xylene during microbial degradation by pure cultures and mixed culture aquifer slurries. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 10: 2981- 2985.
  2. Alberti G (1984) Aspects bactériologiques du compostage des boues résiduaires de stations d‘épuration d‘eau. Thése de 3éme Cycle. Université de Nancy I, France 200p.
  3. Ali H, Khan E, Anwar SM (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals-concepts and applications. Chemosphere. 91: 869-881.
  4. Alavanja MC (2009) Introduction: pesticides use andexposure extensive worldwide. Rev Environ Health. 24: 303-309.
  5. Ahemad M, Kibret M (2013a) Recent trends in microbial biosorption of heavy metals. A review. Biochem Mol Biol 1: 19-26.
  6. Alburquerque JA, Gonzalvez J, Garcia D, Cegarra J (2006) Composting of a solid olive-mill by-product (alperujo) andthe potential of the resulting compost for cultivating pepper under commercial conditions. Waste Manag 26: 620-626.
  7. Arisoy M, Kolankaya N (1998) Biodegradation of Heptachlor byPhanerochaete chrysosporium ME 446: The toxic effects of heptachlor and its metabolites on mice. Turk J Biol 22: 427-434.
  8. Abdel-Raouf MS, Abdul-Raheim ARM (2017) Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Waste Water by Biomass-Based Materials. A Review J Pollut Eff Cont 5: 180.
  9. Adebajo SO, Balogun SA, Akintokun AK (2017) Decolourization of VatDyes by Bacterial Isolates Recovered from Local Textile Mills in Southwest. Microbiology Research Journal International. 18: 1-8.
  10. Agarry S, Latinwo GK (2015) Biodegradation of diesel oil in soil and itsenhancement by application of Bioventing and amendment with brewery waste effluents as BiostimulationBioaugmentation agents. Journal of Ecological Engineering 16: 82-91.
  11. Bending GD, Friloux M, Walker A (2002) Degradation of contrasting pesticides by white rot fungi and its relationship with ligninolytic potential. FEMS Microbiol Lett 212: 59-63.
  12. Bumpus JA, Powers RH, Sun T (1993) Biodegradation of DDE (1, 1dichloro-2,2-bis (4 hlorophenyl) ethane) by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Mycol Res 97: 95-98.
  13. Burd D (2008) Plastic not fantastic. Reports of the Canada Wide Science Fair 1: 1-5.
  14. Bumpus JA, Kakar SN, Coleman RD (1985) Fungal degradation of organophosphorous insecticides.Appl Biochem Biotechnol 39: 715-726.
  15. Baban A, Yediler A, Avaz G, Hostede SS (2010) Biological and oxidativetreatment of cotton textile dye-bath effluents by fixed and fluidized bed reactors. Bioresource technology 101: 1147-52.
  16. Rensing C, Ghosh M, Rosen B (1999) Families of soft-metalion-transporting ΑΤPases J Bacteriol 181: 5891-5897.
  17. Benimeli CS, Fuentes MS, Abate CM, Amoroso MJ (2008) Bioremediation of lindane-contaminated soil by Streptomyces sp. M7 and its effects on Zea mays growth. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 61: 233-239.
  18. Brooijmans RJW, Pastink MI, Siezen RJ (2009) Hydrocarbondegrading bacteria: the oil-spill clean-up crew. Microbial Biotechnology 2: 587-594.
  19. Barkay T, Miller SM, Summers AO (2005) Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 27: 582-589.
  20. Bellion M, Courbot M, Jacob C, Blaudez D, Chalot M (2006) Extracellular and cellular mechanisms sustaining metal tolerance in ectomycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 254: 173-181.
  21. Brar SK, Dhillon GS, Soccol CR (2014) Biotransformation of Waste Biomass into High Value Biochemicals.
  22. Brown LM, Blair A, Gibson R, Everett GD, Canto KP, et al. (1990) Pesticide exposures and other agricultural risk factors for leukemia among men in Iowa and Minnesota.Cancer Res 50: 6585-91.
  23. Canstein H, Kelly S, Li Y, Wagner-Dobler I (2002) Species diversity improves the efficiency of mercury-reducing biofilms under changing environmental conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 2829-2837.
  24. Cha JS, DA Cooksey (1991) Copper resistancein Pseudomonas syringae mediated by periplasmic and outer mem-brane proteins. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America 88: 8915-8919.
  25. Chauhan Ashish and Singh Jashwant (2015) Biodegradation of DDT J Textile Sci Eng 5: 1-8.
  26. Chalmin P, Gaillochet C (2009) An Abstract of World Waste Survey 2009 Available at: http://www.rebnews.com/pdfs/ news/from_waste_to_ resource_report_veolia.pdf.
  27. Chaillan F, Le Fl eche, A Bury E (2004) Identification and biodegradation potential of tropical aerobic hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms. Research in Microbiology 155: 587-595.
  28. Chang CC Ng C, Wang CY, Shyu YT (2009) Activity of cellulase from Thermactinomycetes and Bacillus spp.isolated from Brassica Waste compost Sci Agri, 66: 304-308.
  29. Colberg PJS, Young LY (1995) Anaerobic degradation of non halogenated homocyclic aromatic compounds coupled with nitrate, iron or sulfate. In: Microbiological Transformation and Degradation of Toxic Organic Chemicals 301-304.
  30. Cervantes C, Gutierrz-Corona F (1994) Copper resistance mechanisms in bacteria and fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 14: 121-138.
  31. Chung WK, King GM (2001) Isolation, characterization, and polyaromatic hydrocarbondegradation potential of aerobic bacteria from marine macro-faunal burrow sedimentsand description of Lutibacterium anuloederans gen. nov, sp nov., and Cycloclasticusspirillensus sp. nov. Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 67: 5585-5592.
  32. Chang JS, Lin CY (2001) Decolorization kinetics of a recombinant Escherichiacoli strain harboringazodye-decolorizing determinants from Rhodococcus sp. Biotechnology Letters, 23: 631-6.
  33. Chatterjee S, Gupta D, Roy P, Chatterjee NC, Saha P, Dutta (2011) Study of a lead tolerant yeast strain BUSCY1. Afr J Microbiol Res 5: 5362-5372.
  34. Cripps C, Bumpus JA, Aust SD (1990) Biodegradation of azo and heterocyclic dyes by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56: 1114-1118.
  35. Colwell RR, Walker JD, Cooney JJ (1977) Ecological aspects of microbial degradation of petroleum in the marine environment. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 5: 423-445.
  36. Dauguli S AJ, McCracken CM (2003) Microbial degradation of high and low molecular weight polyaromatic hydrocarbons in a two-phase partitioning bioreactor by two strains of Sphingomonas sp. Biotechnology Letters, 25: 1441-1444.
  37. Dias ES,Guimaraes SE, Siqueira FG, Silva R, Batista LR (2009) Allergenic and toxigenic fungi in the compost of cultivation of Agaricus brasiliensis.Scientia Agaria 10: 507- 511.
  38. Dejonghe W, Boon N, Seghers D, EM Top, W Verstraete (2001) Bioaugmentation of soils by increasing microbial richness: missing links. Environ Microbiol 3: 649-657.
  39. Deppe U, Richnow HH, Michaelis W, Antranikian G (2005) Degradation of crude oil by an arctic microbial consortium. Extremophiles 9: 461-470.
  40. Delille D, Duval A, Pelletier E (2008) Highly efficient pilot bio piles for onsite fertilization treatment of diesel oilcontaminated sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol 54: 7-18
  41. Dheeba B, Sampathkumar P, Kannan K (2015) Fertilizers and mixed crop cultivation of chromium tolerant and sensitive plants under chromium toxicity. J Toxicol 2: 23-32.
  42. De Lorenzo V (2006) Blue-print of an oil-eating bacterium. Nat Biotechnol 24: 952-953.
  43. Borden RC, Ximena Rodriguez B (2006) Evaluation of slow release substrates for anaerobic bioremediation. J Biorem 10: 59-69.
  44. Dollacker A (1991) Pesticides in third world Pilank Nachor. Bayer 44: 89-99.
  45. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Marine Litter-Trash That Kills. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/ debris/toolkit/files.
  46. ENTEC (1993) Directory of Environmental Technology. Earthscan Publications and Lewis Publishers CRC Press, Ann Arbor MI.
  47. Emami S, Pourbabaee AA, Alikhani HA (2012) Bioremediation Principles and Techniques on Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil. Technical Journal Engineering and Applied Sciences 2: 320-3.
  48. Fang H, Dong B, Yan H, Tang F, Yunlong Y (2010) Characterization of a bacterial strain capable of degrading DDT Congeners and its use in bioremediation of contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 184: 281-289.
  49. Fabianil C, Rusciol F, Spadonil M, Pizzichini M (1996) Chromium (III) salts recovery process from tannery wastewaters. Desalination 108: 183.
  50. Franciscon E, Zille A, Durrant LR, Fantinatti GF, CavacoPaulo A (2009b) Microaerophilic-aerobic sequential decolourization/biodegradation of textile azo dyes by a facultative Klebsiella sp. Strain VN-31. Process Biochem 44: 446-52.
  51. Fritsche W, Hofrichter M (2000) Aerobic degradation by microorganisms in Environmental Processes-Soil decontamination J Klein Ed 146-155.
  52. Fomina M, Gadd GM (2019) Biosorption: current perspectives on concept defnition and application. Bioresource Technology 160: 5-19.
  53. FAO (2000) Specifications and Evaluations for Agricultural Pesticides: Thiamethoxam. (http://www.fao.org/ag/agp/agpp/ pesticid/).
  54. Forss J, Lindh MV, Pinhassi J (2017) Microbial biotreatment of actual textile wastewater in a Continuous sequential rice husk biofilter and the microbial community involved. PLoS ONE 12.
  55. Franciscon E, Zille A, Durrant LR, Fantinatti GF, CavacoPaulo A (2009b) Microaerophilic-aerobic sequential decolourization/biodegradation of textile azo dyes by a facultative Klebsiella sp. Strain VN-31. Process Biochem 44: 446-52.
  56. GargP A, Gupta A, Satya S (2006) Vermicomposting of different types of waste using Eisenia foetida: A comparative study. Biores. Technol 97: 391-395.
  57. Goda SK, EE Elsayed, TA Khodair, W ElSayed, ME Mohamed (2010) Screening form and isolation and identification of malathion degrading bacteria: cloning and sequencing a gene that potentially encodes the malathion-degrading enzyme, carboxylestrase in soil bacteria. Biodegradation 21: 903-13.
  58. Green-Ruiz C (2006) Mercury (II) removal from aqueous solutions by nonviable Bacillus sp. from a tropical estuary Bioresour. Technol 97: 1907-1911.
  59. Gadd GM (1993) Interaction of fungi with toxic metals. New Phytol 124: 25-60.
  60. Grant RJ, Daniell TJ, Betts WB (2002) Isolation and identification of synthetic pyrethroid-degrading bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 92: 534-540.
  61. Gupta A, Matsui K, Lo JF (1999) Silver S Molecular basis for resistance to silver cations in Salmonella Nat. Med 5: 183-188.
  62. Gupta R, Mohapatra H (2003) Microbial biomass: an economical alternative for removal of heavy metals from waste water. Indian. J Exp Biol 41: 945-966.
  63. Gaur AC (1999) Microbial Technology for Composting of Agricultural Residues by Improved Methods, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
  64. Gomez MJ, Pazos F, Guijarro FJ, de Lorenzo V, Valencia A (2007) The environmental fate of organic pollutants through the global microbial metabolism. Mol Syst Biol 3: 1-11.
  65. Gill RA, Zang L, Ali B, Farooq MA, Cui P, Yang S, Zhou W (2015) Chromium-induced physio-chemical and ultrastructural changes in four cultivars of Brassica napus L. Chemosphere 120: 154-164.
  66. Godlewska-Zyłkiewicz B (2006) Microorganisms in inorganic chemical analysis. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 589: 119-125.
  67. Gina S, Ogunseitan OA, Jan K (2000) Pesticides and Human Health. California, San Francisco: Physicians for Social Responsibility and Californians for Pesticide Reform.
  68. Grass G, Wong MD, Rosen BP, Smith RL, Rensing C (2002) ZupT is a Zn (II) uptake system in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 184: 864-866.
  69. Hachicha R, Hassen A, Jedidi N, Kallali H (1992) Optimal conditions for MSW composting. Biocycle, J. Waste Recyc, 33: 76-77.
  70. Haught RC, Neogy R, Vonderhaar SS, Krishnan ER, Safferman SI, Ryan J (1995) Land treatmentalternatives for bioremediating wood preserving wastes. Hazard Waste Hazard Mater 12: 329-344.
  71. Head IM, Martin JD, Röling WFM (2006) Marine microorganisms make a meal of oil. Nat RevMicrobiol. 4: 173-182.
  72. HernándezRodríguez A, Heydrich Pérez M, AceboGuerrero Y, Velázquezdel Valle MG, Hernández Lauzardo AN (2008) Antagonistic activity ofCuban native rhizobacteria against Fusarium verticillioidesSacc.) Nirenb. in maize (Zea maysL) Applied Soil Ecology 36: 184-186.
  73. Heinfling A, Martinez M, Martinez A, Bergbauer M, Szewzyk U (1998a) Transformation of industrial dyes by manganese peroxidases from Bjerkandera adusta and Pleurotus eryngii in a Manganese -independent reaction. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64: 2788-2793.
  74. Heinfling A, Ruiz-Dueñas F, Martínez M, Bergbauer H, Szewzyk U, Martínez A (1998b) A study on reducing substrates of manganese-oxidizing peroxidases from Pleurotus eryngii and Bjerkandera adusta. FEBS Letters 428: 141-146.
  75. Higham DP, Sadler PJ, Scawen MD (1986) Cadmiumbinding proteins in pseudomonas putida: Pseudothioneins. Environmental Health Perspectives 62: 2-11.
  76. Hommel RK (1990) Formation and phylogenetic role of biosurfactants. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 89: 158-119.
  77. Holliger C, Gaspard SG, Glod G (1997) Contaminated environments in the subsurface and bioremediation: Organic contaminants, FEMS Microbiology Reviews 20: 517‑523.
  78. Hubbe MA, Nazhad M, Sanchez C (2010) Composting as a way to convert cellulosic biomass and organic waste into high-value soil amendments: A review. BioResources 5: 2808-2854.
  79. Huang S, Peng B, Yang Z, Chai L, Zhou L (2009) Chromium accumulation, microorganism population and enzyme activities in soils around chromium-containing slag heap of steel alloy factory. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China. 19: 241-248.
  80. Hu YA, Liu XP, Bai JM, Shih KM, Zeng EY, Cheng HF (2013) Assessing heavy metal pollution inthe surface soils of a region that had undergone three decades of intense industrialization and urbanization. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20: 6150‑6159.
  81. Hussain S, Arshad M, Saleem M, Zahir ZA (2007b) Screening of soil fungi for in vitro degradation of endosulfan. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23: 939-945.
  82. Iida T, Sumita T, Ohta A, Takagi M (2000) The cytochrome P450ALK multigene family of an n-alkane-assimilating yeast, Yarrowia lioplytica: cloning and characterization of genes coding for new CYP52 family members. Yeast 16: 1077-1087.
  83. Liu FY, Hong MZ, Liu DM, Li YW, Shou PS, et al. (2007) Biodegradation of methyl parathion by Acinetobacter radioresistens USTB‑04. J Environ. Sci 1257-1260.
  84. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IGPCC) (2001) The Third Assessment of Climate Change. United Nations.
  85. Indu TS, Shaili S (2011) Bioremediation and bioconversionof chromium and pentachlorophenol in tannery effuent by microorganisms. International Journal of Technology 5: 229-255.
  86. ISWA (1999) International directory of solid waste management. James 53-76.
  87. Laschi S, Ogonczyk D, Palchetti I, Mascini M (2007) Evaluation of pesticide-induced acetylcholinesterase inhibition by means of disposable carbon-modified electrochemical biosensors. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 40: 485-489.
  88. Lee SW, Glickmann E, Cooksey DA (2001) Chromosomal locus for cadmiumresistance in Pseudomonas putida consisting of a cadmium-trasporting ATPase and aMerR family response regulator, Appl. Environ Microbiol 67: 1437- 1444.
  89. Leja K, Lewandowicz G (2010) Polymer biodegradation and biodegradablepolymers-a review. Polish J Environ Stud 19: 255-266.
  90. Lopez L, Pozo C, Rodelas B, Calvo C, Juarez B, et al. (2005) Identification of bacteria isolated from an oligotrophic lake with pesticide removal capacities. Ecotoxicology, 14: 299- 312.
  91. Iyer A, Mody K, Jha B (2005) Biosorption of heavy metals by a marine bacterium. Mar Pollut Bull 50: 340-343.
  92. Jalil MA, Mian MN, Rahman MK (2013) Using plastic bags and its damaging impact on environment and agriculture: An alternative proposal. International Journal of Learning and Development 3: 1-4.
  93. Jauregui J, Valderrama B, Albores A, Vazquez-Duhalt R (2003) Microsomal transformation of organophosphorus pesticides by white rot fungi. Biodegradation 14: 397-406.
  94. Jain PK, Bajpai V (2012) Biotechnology of bioremediationa review. International journal of environmental sciences 3: 535-49.
  95. Jilani S, Altaf Khan M (2004) Isolation, characterization and growth response of pesticides degrading bacteria. J Biol Sci 4: 15-20.
  96. Jan B, Beilen V, Neuenschwunder M (2003) Rubredoxins involved in alkane degradation. The Journal of Bacteriology 184: 1722-1732.
  97. Jayashree R, Nithya SE, Rajesh PP, Krishnaraju M (2012) Biodegradation capability of bacterial species isolated from oil contaminated soil. J Academia Indust Res 1: 140-143.
  98. Jyoti B, Harsh KSN (2019) Utilizing Aspergillus nigerfor bioremediation of tannery effluent. Octa Journal of Environmental Research 2: 77-81.
  99. Kamaludeen SP, Megharaj M, Juhasz AL, Sethunathan N, Naidu R (2003) Chromium microorganism Interactions in soils: remediation implications. Rev Environ contam Toxicol 178: 93-164.
  100. Kumar A, Bisht BS, Joshi VD, Dhewa T (2011) Review on bioremediation of polluted environment: a management tool. Int J Environ Sci 1: 1079-1093.
  101. Kumar S (2011) Composting of municipal solid waste. Critical reviews in biotechnology 31: 112-136.
  102. Varunprasath K, Daniel AN (2010) Comparison studies of three fresh water in Tamil Nadu, India Iranica. J Energy Environ 315-320.
  103. Kameil, Takagik, Kondor (2011) Degradation of endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate bywhite ‑rot fungus, Trametes bisute. J Wood sci 57: 317-322.
  104. Khan MA, Ahmad I, Ur Rahman I (2007) Effect of environmental pollution onheavy metals content of Withania somnifera. J Chin Chem Soc 54: 339-343.
  105. Kumaran NS, Sundaramanicam A, Bragadeeswaran S (2011) Adsorption studies on heavy metals by isolated cyanobacterial strain (nostoc sp.) from uppanar estuarine water, southeast coast of India. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 7: 1609- 1615.
  106. Kumar S, Chaurasia P, Kumar A (2016) Isolation and Characterization of Microbial Strains fromTextile Industry Effluents of Bhilwara, India: Analysis with Bioremediation. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 8: 143-50.
  107. Karpouzas DG, Fotopoulou A, Menkissoglu Spiroudi U, Singh BK (2005) Non‑specific biodegradation of the organophosphorus pesticides, cadusafos andethoprophos, by two bacterial isolates. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53: 369-378.
  108. Kaufman DD, Russel BB, Helling CS, Kayser AJ (1981) Movement of Cypermethrin, decamethrin, permethrin and their degradation products in soil. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 29: 239-245.
  109. Karalliedde L, Senanayake N (1999) Organo phosphorus insecticide poisoning. J Int Fed Clin Chem 11: 4-9.
  110. Kumar A, Gaind S, Nain L (2008) Evaluation of Thermophilic Fungal Consortium for Paddy Straw Composting. Biodegradation 19: 395-402.
  111. Kanotra S, Mathur RS (1994) Biodegradation of paddy straw with cellulolytic fungi and its application on wheat crop. Bio resource Technology 47: 185-188.
  112. Kim YH, Ahn JY, Moon SH, Lee J (2005) Biodegradation anddetoxification of organophosphate insecticide, Malathion by Fusarium oxysporumpisi cutinase. Chemosphere 60: 1349- 1355.
  113. Khan MU, Shahbaz N, Waheed S, Mahmood A, Shinwari ZK, et al. (2016) Comparative health risk surveillance of heavy metals via dietary foodstuff consumption in different land usetypes of Pakistan. Hum Ecol Risk Assess An Int J 22: 168-186.
  114. Kamanavalli CM, Ninnekar HZ (2005) Biodegradation of DDT by a Pseudomonas Species. Curr. Microbiol 48: 10-13.
  115. Kwon GS, Sohn HY, Shin KS, Kim E, Seo BI (2005) Biodegradation ofthe organochlorine insecticide, endosulfan, and the toxic metabolite, endosulfansulfate, by Klebsiella oxytoca KE‑8. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 67: 845-850.
  116. Lal R, DM Saxena DM (1982) Accumulation, metabolism, and effects oforganochlorineinsecticides on microorganisms. Microbiol Rev 46: 95-127.
  117. Liang WQ, Wang ZY, Li H, Wu PC, Hu JM, et al. (2005) Purification and characterization of a novel pyrethroidhydrolase from Aspergillus niger ZD11. J Agric Food Chem 53: 7415- 7420.
  118. Lee TH, Byun IG, Kim YO (2002) Monitoring biodegradation ofdiesel fuel in bioventing processes using in situ respiration rate. Water Science and Technology 53: 263-72.
  119. Lee IS, OK Kim, YY Chang, B Bae, HH Kim, et al. (2002) Heavy metal concentrations and enzyme activitiesin soil from a contaminated Korean shooting range. J Biosci Bioeng 94: 406-411.
  120. Levin L, Papinatti L, Forchiassin F (2004) Evaluation of Argentinean white rot fungi for their ability to produce ligninmodifying enzymes and decolorize industrial dyes. Bioresour Technol. 94: 169-176.
  121. Lambert JM, Yang T, Thomson NR, Barker JF (2009) Pulsed biosparging of a residual fuel source emplaced at CFB borden, Inter. J Soil Sedi Water.
  122. Leahy JG, Colwell RR (1990) Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiological Reviews 54: 305-315.
  123. Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM (2004) Lehninger‘s Principles of Biochemistry, WH Freeman, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition.
  124. Liu L, Zhang X, Zhong T (2015) Pollution and health risk assessment of heavy metals in urban soil in China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess An Int. 22: 424-434.
  125. Luptakova A, Kusnierova M (2005) Bioremediation of acid drainage contaminated by SRB. Hydrometallurgy 77: 97-102.
  126. Matsumura F, Boush GM, Tai A (1968) Breakdown of dieldrin in the soil by a microorganism. Nature 219: 965-967.
  127. Mohamed MZK, NAH Fetyan, MA Ibrahim, S El-Nagdy (2008) Biodegradation and Detoxification of Malathion by Bacillus Thuringiensis MOS-5. Aust. J Basic and Appl Sci 2: 724-732.
  128. Mohamed KZ, MA Ahmed, NA Fetyan, SM Elnagdy (2010) Isolation and molecular characterisation of malathiondegrading bacterial strains from waste water in Egypt J Adv Res 1: 145-149.
  129. Matsumura S, Soeda Y, Toshima K (2006) Perspectives for synthesis and production of polyurethanes and related polymers by enzymes directedtoward green and sustainable chemistry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 70: 12-20.
  130. Miao Z, Brusseau ML, Johnson B, KC Carroll, C CarreonDiazconti (2012) Sulphate reduction inGroundwater: Characterization and applications for remediation. EnvironGeochem Health 34: 539-550.
  131. Marzan LW, Hossain M, Mina SA, Akter Y, Chowdhury AMM (2017) Isolation and biochemical characterization of heavymetal resistant bacteria from tannery e4uent in Chittagong city, Bangladesh: Bioremediation viewpoint. EgyptianJournal of Aquatic Research, 95: 65-79.
  132. Muhammad MJ, Ikramul-Haq Farrukh S (2007) Biosorption of Mercury from Industrial Effluent by Fungal Consortia, Bioremediation Journal 11: 149-153.
  133. Ian R. McDonald, Carlos B. Miguez, Gerlinde Rogge, Denis Bourque, Karin D. Wendlandt, et al. (2006) Diversity of soluble methane monooxygenase-containing methanotrophs isolated from polluted environments. FEMS Microbiology Letters 255: 225-232.
  134. Mc Elroy AE, JW Farrington, JM Teal (1989) Bioavailability of polycyclic aromatichydrocarbons in the aquatic environment. In Metabolism of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydro-carbons in the Aquatic Environment, U Varanasi (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  135. Mukherjee, I., and Mittal, A., 2005. Bioremediation of endosulfan using Aspergillusterreus and Cladosporium oxysporum. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 75, 1034‑1040.
  136. McKew BA, Coulon F, Osborn AM, Timmis KN, McGenity TJ (2007) Determining the identity and roles of oil-metabolizing marine bacteria from the Thames estuary. Environ. Microbiol 9: 165-176.
  137. Maeng JHO, Sakai Y, Tani Y, Kato N (1996) Isolation and characterization of a novel oxygenase that catalyzes the first step of n-alkane oxidation in Acinetobacter sp. strain M-1, Journal of Bacteriology 178: 3695‑3700.
  138. .McLean KS, Lawrence GW (2003) Efficacy of aldicarb to Rotylenchulus reniformis and biodegradation in cotton field soils. J Nematol 35: 65-72.
  139. Mai C, Schormann W, Milstein O, Huttermann A (2000) Enhanced stability of laccase in the presence of phenolic compounds. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 54: 510-514.
  140. Margesin R, Schinner F (1999) Biological decontamination of oil spills in cold environments. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 74: 381-389.
  141. Maas R, Chudhari S (2005) Adsorption and biological decolorization of azo dye reactive red 2 in semi continuous anaerobic reactors. Process Biochem 40: 699-705.
  142. McGuinness M, Dowling D (2009) PlantAssociated Bacterial Degradation of Toxic Organic Compounds in Soil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 6: 2226-2247.
  143. Mohanty M, Patra HK (2011) Attenuation of chromium toxicity by bioremediation technology. Rev. Environ. Contam Toxicol 210: 1-34.
  144. Marrug C, Grebus M, Hassen RC, Keener HM, Hoitink HAJ (1993) A kinetic model of yard waste composting process. Compost Sci Util 1: 38-51.
  145. Musarrat J, Bano N, Rao RAK (2000) Isolation and characterization of 2, 4‑dichlorophenoxyacetic acid‑ catabolizing bacteria and their biodegradation efficiency in soil. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 16: 495-497.
  146. Myslak ZW, Bolt HM (1988) Berufliche Exposition Gegenüber Azofarbstoffen Harnblasenkarzinom-Risiko. Zbl. Arbeitsmed 38: 310-21.
  147. Moosvi S, Kher X, Madamwar D (2007) Isolation, characterization and decolorization of textile dyes by a mixed bacterial consortium JW-2. Dyes Pigm 74: 723-9.
  148. Meysami P, Baheri H (2003) Prescreening of fungi and bulking agents for contaminated soil bioremediation. Adv Environ Res 7: 881-887.
  149. Madhavi GN, Mohini DD (2012) Review paper on Parameters affecting bioremediation. International journal of life science and pharma research 2: 77-80.
  150. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural development of Ethiopia (MOARD) (2007) Crop protection Department. List of Registered Pesticides
  151. Mustin M (1987) Le compost: gestion de la matiére organique, Dubusc F (Ed.) Paris pp117‑242.
  152. NRC (National Research Council) (1994) Committee on Groundwater Cleanup Alternatives.In Alternatives for Groundwater Cleanup. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.NRC (National Research Council) (2000). Natural Attenuation for Groundwater Remediation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  153. Nies DH (2000) Heavy metal-resistant bacteria as extremophiles: molecular physiology and biotechnological use of Ralstonia sp. CH34 extremophiles 4: 77-82.
  154. Niu GL, Zhang JJ, Zhao S, Liu H, Boon N (2009) Bio augmentation of a 4-chloronitrobenzene contaminated soil with Pseudomonas putida ZWL73. Environ Pollut. 157: 763- 771.
  155. Neill C, Hawke FR, Hawkes DL, Lourenço ND, Pinheiro HM, et al. (1999) Colour in textile effluents sources, measurement, discharge consents and simulation: a review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 74: 1009-18.
  156. Nadeau LJ, Fu-Min M, Breen A, Sayler GS (1994) Aerobic degradation of (1,1,1 trichloro-2,2-bis (4-chlorophenyl) ethane) DDT byAlcaligenes eutrophus A5. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 51-5.
  157. Oger C, Mahillon J, Petit F (2003) Distribution and diversity of a cadmium resistance (cadA) determinant and occurrence of IS257 insertion sequences in Staphylococcal bacteria isolated from a contaminated estuary (Seine, France) FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43: 173-183.
  158. Ortega NO, Nitschke M, Mouad AM, Landgraf MD, et al. (2011) Isolation of Brazilian marine fungi capable of growing on DDD pesticide. Biodegradation 22: 43-50.
  159. Okeke BC, Siddique T, Arbestain MC, Frankenberger WT (2002) Biodegradation of gama-hexachlorocyclohexane and alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane inwater and soil slurry by Pandoraea sp. J Agric Food Chem 50: 2548-2555.
  160. Pararlioglu NK, Urek RO, Ergum F (2005) Biodecolourization of direct blue15 immobilized Phanerochate chrysosprium. ProcessBiochem 40: 1923-1929.
  161. Palmieri G, Cennamo G, Sannia G (2005) Rama 201 Brilliant R decolorization by the fungus Pleurotus ostreatus and its oxidative enzymatic system. Enzyme Microb Technol 36P: 17-27.
  162. Paingankar M, Jain M, Deobagkar D (2005) Biodegradation of allethrin, apyrethroid insecticide, by an Acidomonas sp Biotechnology Letters 27: 1909-1913.
  163. Pesce SF, Wunderlin DA (2004) Biodegradation of lindane by a nativebacterial consortium isolated from contaminated river sediment. Int.Biodeterior. Biodegradation 54: 255-260.
  164. Patil KC, Matsumura F, Boush GM (1970) Degradation of Endrin, Aldrin and DDT by soil microorganisms. J Appl Microbiol 19: 879-881.
  165. Paredes C, Bernal MP, Roig A, (1996) International Biodeterioration &Biodegradation, 38, 205-210.
  166. Pattus, F, Abdallah, M, 2000 Siderophores and iron-transport in microorganisms. Review J Chin Chem Soc, 47: 1-20.
  167. Piontek K, Antorini M, Choinowski T (2002) Crystal structure of a laccase from the fungusTrametes versicolor at 1.90-Å resolution containing a full complement of coppers. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277: 37663-37669.
  168. Philp JC, Atlas RM (2005) Bioremediation of contaminated soils andaquifers. In: Atlas RM, Philp JC (eds) Bioremediation: applied microbial solutions for real-world environmental cleanup. American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Press, Washington 139-236.
  169. Pongratz R, Heumann KG (1999) Production of mehylated mercury, lead and cadmium by marine bacteria as a significant natural source for atmospheric heavy metals in Polar Regions. Chemosphere 39: 89-102.
  170. Pulford I, Watson C (2003) Phytoremediation of heavy metalcontaminated land by trees-a review. Environ Int 29: 529-540.
  171. Quintero JC, Lu-Chau T, Moreira MT, Feijoo G, Lema JM (2007) Bioremediation of HCH present in soil by the whiterot fungus Bjerkandera adustain a slurry batch bioreactor. Int Biodeter Biodegr 60: 319-326.
  172. Rahman KSM, TJ Rahman Y, Kourkoutas I, Petsas R, Marchant, et al. (2003) Enhanced bioremediationof n-alkane in petroleum sludge using bacterial consortium amended with rhamnolipid and micronutrients, Bioresource Technology 90: 159-168.
  173. Rajeswari k, Subashkumar R, Vijayaraman K (2013) Physico chemical parameters of Effluents collected from Tirupur Textile dyeing and CETP and analysis of Heterotropic bacterial population”Microbiol J Biotech Res 3: 37-41.
  174. Rajwde JM, Paknikarkm (1997) Microbiogical detoxification of chromte from chromate- effluents in proceeding of international Biohydrometallurgy symposium IBS97 (Austrian Mineral foundation, Glenside, Austria E-ROM4 1.
  175. Raymond RL, VW Jamison, JO Hudson (1977) Beneficial stimulation of bacterial activity in groundwater containing petroleum hydrocarbons. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series 73: 390-404.
  176. Ramasamy K, S Kamaludeen, Parwin B (2006) Bioremediationof metals microbial processes and techniques,” inEnvironmental Bioremediation Technologies, S.N. Singh and RD Tripathi Eds pp173-187.
  177. Ren SZ, Guo J, Zeng GQ, et al. (2006) Decolorization of triphenylmethane, azo,and anthraquinone dyes by a newly isolated Aeromonas hydrophila strain. Appl MicrobiolBiotechnol, 72: 1316-1321.
  178. Rockne, K, Reddy, K, (2003) Bioremediation of Contaminated Sites, University of Illinois at Chicago
  179. Rigas, F, Dritsa, V, Marchant, R, Papadopoulou, K, Avramides, E, Hatzianestis I 2007 Biodegradation of lindane by Pleurotus ostreatus via central composite design. Environ Int 31: 191- 196.
  180. Roberts JN, Singh R, Grigg JC et al. (2011) Characterization of dye-decolorizing peroxidases from Rhodococcus jostii RHA1. Biochemistry 50: 5108-5119.
  181. RTI (2000) Toxicological profile for chromium.Syracuse Research Corportion for U.S.Department of Health and Human Service .Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry, Atlanta.
  182. Roy PK, Surekha P, Tulsi E, (2008) Degradation of abiotically aged LDPEfilms containing pro-oxidant by bacterial consortium. Polym Degrad Stab 93: 1917-1922.
  183. Robinson T, Chandran B, Nigam P (2002) Removal of dyes from a synthetic textile dye effluent by biosorption on apple pomace and wheat straw. Water Res 36: 2824-2830.
  184. Sakurai T (1992) Anaerobic reactions of Rhusvernicifera laccase and its type-2 copper-depleted derivatives with hexacyano ferrate (II). Biochemistry Journal 284: 681-685.
  185. Sharma S, Kalpana AS, Suryavathi V, Singh PRS, Sharma K (2007) Toxicity assessment of textile dye wastewater using swiss albino rats. Australian Journal of Ecology 13: 81-85.
  186. Sette LD, de Oliveira VM, Manfio GP (2005) Isolation and characterizationof alachlor degrading actinomycetes from soil. Int J Gen Molec Microbiol 87: 81-89.
  187. Singh BK, Walker A, Alun J, Morgan W, Wright DJ (2004) Biodegradation of Chlorpyrifos by Enterobacter Strain B-14 and Its use in bioremediation of contaminated soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 4855-4863.
  188. Sethunathan N, Megharaj M, Chen ZL, Williams BD, Lewis G, et al. (2004) Algal degradation of a known endocrine disrupting insecticide, alpha endosulfan, and its metabolite, endosulfan sulfate, in liquid medium and soil. J Agric Food Chem, 52: 3030-3035
  189. Shukla KP, Singh NK, Sharma S (2010) Bioremediation: developments, current practices and perspectives. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Journal 3: 1-20.
  190. Steel H, dela pena EF, onderie P, Willekens K, Borgonie G, et al. (2010) Nematode succession during composting and the potential of the nematode community as an indicator of compost maturity.Pedobiologia 53: 181-190.
  191. Silva CF, Azevedo RS, Braga C, Silva R, Dias ES, Schwan RF (2009) AMicrobial diversity in bagasse-based compost prepared for the productionn of Agaricus brasiliensis, Braz JMicrobio l40: 590-600.
  192. Sutherland TD, Horne I, Harcourt RL, Russell RJ, Oakeshott, JG (2002) Isolation and characterization of a Mycobacterium strain that metabolizes the insectide endosulfan. J Appl Microbiol 93: 380-389.
  193. Sogorb MA, Vilanova, E, Carrera V (2004) Future application of phosphotriesterases in the prophylaxis and treatment of organophosphorus insecticide and nerve agent poisoning. Toxicol Lett 151: 219-233.
  194. Singh SN, Tripathi RD (2007) Environmental bioremediation technologies, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  195. Saikia N, Das SK, Patel BKC, Niwas R, Singh A, Gopal M (2005) Biodegradation of beta‑cyfluthrin by Pseudomonas stutzeri strain S1.Biodegradation 16: 581-589.
  196. Scow KM, Hicks KA (2005) Natural attenuation and enhanced bioremediation of organic contaminants in ground-water. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 16: 246-253.
  197. Shimao M (2001) Biodegradation of plastics. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 12: 242-247.
  198. Sharma PK, Balkwill DL, Frenkel A, Vairavamurthy MA (2000) A new Klebsiella planticola strain (Cd-1) grows anaerobically at high cadmium concentrations and precipitates cadmium sulfide Appl. Environ Microbiol 66: 3083-3087.
  199. Saratale R, Saratale G, Chang J, Govindwar S (2011b) Bacterial decolorization and degradation of azo dyes: A review. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineering, 42, 138‑157.
  200. Spain JC, Nishino SF (1987) Degradation of 1, 4-Dichlorobenzene by a Pseudomonas sp. Appl. Environ Microbiol 53: 1010-1019.
  201. Spadaro JT, Renganathan V (1994) Peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of azo dyes: mechanism of Disperse Yellow 3 degradation. Arch Bio-chem Biophys 312: 301-307.
  202. Singh S, Singh B, Mishra B, et al. (2012) Microorganisms in Sustainable Agriculture and Biotechnology Springer Netherlands pp127-151.
  203. Shibamoto Takayuki, Bjeldanes Leonard F (1993) Introduction to food toxicology. San Diego, California, Academic press, INC.
  204. Strong PJ, Burgess JE (2008) Treatment methods for winerelated ad distillery wastewaters. Review Bioremediation Journal 12: 70-87.
  205. Seshadri R, Heidelberg J (2005) Bacteria to the rescue. Nat Biotechnol 23: 1236-1237.
  206. Stentiford EI (1996) Composting Control: Principles and Practice, Blackie Academic and Professiona.
  207. Satish G, Parte Ashokrao, D Mohekar, Arun S Khara (2017) Microbial degradation of pesticide: A review African Journal of Microbiology Research 11: 992-1012.
  208. Salehizadeh H, Shojaosadati SA (2005) Removal of metal ions from aqueous solution by polysaccharide produced from Bacillus frmus. Water research 57: 925-955.
  209. Soloman PA, Basha CA, Velan M, Ramamurthi V, Koteeswaran K, et al. (2009) Electrochemical degradation of Remazol Black Bdye effluent. CLEAN‑Soil Air Water 37: 889-900
  210. Suteu D, Zaharia C, Bibla DA, Muresan R, Muresan, et al. (2009) Decolourization wastewater from the textile industryphysical methods, chemical methods, Ind. Textila 5: 254-263.
  211. Sandhya S, Padmavathy S, Swaminathan K, Subrahmanyam YV, Kaul SN (2005) Microaerophilic aerobic sequential batch reactor for treatment of azo dyes containing simulated wastewater. Process Biochemistry 40: 885-90.
  212. Sprenger WW, Dijkstra A, Zwart GJM, van Agterveld MP, van Noort PCM (2003) Competition of a parathion‑hydrolyzing Flavobacterium with bacteria from ditch water in carbon‑, nitrate‑ and phosphate‑limitedcontinuous cultures. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 43: 45-53.
  213. Siddique T, Okeke BC, Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (2003a) Enrichment and isolation of endosulfan‑degrading microorganisms. J EnvironQual, 32: 47-54.
  214. Subramanian G, Sekar S, Sampoornam S (1994) Biodegradation and utilization of organophosphorus pesticides by Cyanobacteria. Intern Biodet Biodeg 33: 129-143.
  215. Tadesse A, Asferachew A (2008) An assessment of the pesticide use practice and hazards in the Ethiopian rift valley
  216. Tiefenbacher JP, Hagelman RR (2013) Environmental equity in UrbanTexas: race, income and patterns of acute and chronic toxic air releasesin metropolitan countries. Urban Geography 20(6), 516‑533.
  217. Taiwo LB, Oso BA (2004) Influence of composting techniques on microbial succession temperature and pH in a compositng municipal solid waste. AfrJ Biotechno l3: 239-243.
  218. Thai Anh Nguyen, Chun-Chieh Fu, Ruey Shin, Juang (2016) Biosorption and biodegradation of a sulfur dye in highstrengthdyeing wastewater by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Journal of Environmental Management 182: 265-271.
  219. Thapa B, Kumar AKC, Ghimire A (2012) A review on Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in soil. Kathmandu University. Journal of science, engineering and technology 8: 164-70.
  220. Titah HS, Abdullaha SRS, Mushrifah I, Anuar N, Basri H, Mukhlisin M (2013) Effect of applying rhizobacteria and fertilizer on the growth of Ludwigiaoctovalvis for arsenic uptake and accumulationin phytoremediation.Ecol Eng 58: 303-313.
  221. Throne-Holst M, A Wentzel TE, Ellingsen, HK, Kotlar and Zotchev, S B, 2007Identification of novel genes involved in long-chain n-alkane degradation by Acinetobacter sp. strain DSM 17874, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73: 3327-3332.
  222. Tariq, M, Ali, M, Shah, Z, 2006 Characteristics of industrial effluents and their possible impacts on quality of underground water. Soil Environ 25: 64-69.
  223. Thangavel, P, Subbhuraam, C, 2004 Phytoextraction: role of hyperaccumulators in metal contaminated soils. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad Part B 70: 109-130.
  224. Tálos, K, Páger, C, Tonk, S, Majdik, C, Kocsis, B, Kilár, F, Pernyeszi, T, 2009 Cadmium biosorption on native Saccharomyces cerevisiaecells in aqueous suspension. Agriculture and Environment 1: 20-30.
  225. Tay, CC, Liew, HH, Yong, SK, Surif, S, Redzwan, G, AbdulTalib, S, 2012 Cu (II) removalonto fungal derived biosorbents: Biosorption performance and the half saturation constant concentration approach. International Journal of Research in Chemistry and Environment 2: 138-143.
  226. Tony, BD, Goyal, D, Khanna, S, 2009 Decolorization of textile azo dyes by aerobic bacterial consortium. Int Bio deterior Biodegr 63: 462-9.
  227. USEPA 2004 Cleaning up the Nation‘s waste sites: markets and technology trends. technology innovation and field services division, office of solid waste and emergency response, EPA 542R-04-015
  228. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2000 Marine Litter-Trash That Kills. Available from: http://www.epa. gov/owow/oceans/debris/toolkit/files/trash_that_kills508.pdf.
  229. Ulrici W, 2000 Contaminant soil areas, different countries and contaminant monitoring of contaminants in Environmental Process II. Soil Decontamination Biotechnology, HJRehm and G Reed, Eds 11: 5-42.
  230. Viti C, Pace A, Giovannetti L (2005) Characterization of Cr (VI)-resistant bacteria isolated from chromium-contaminated soil by tannery activity. Current Microbiology 96: 1-9.
  231. Van Beilen JB, Funho EG, Van Loon A, et al. (2006) Cytochrome P450 alkane hydroxylases of the CYP153 familyare common in alkane-degrading eubacteria lacking integra membrane alkane hydroxylases. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 59-65.
  232. Vijayaraghavan, K and Yun, YS, 2008 Bacterial biosorbents and biosorption, Biotechnology Advances, 26: 266-271.
  233. WHO 2006 Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide-Global Update 2005. World Health Organization, Geneva.
  234. Wangila WJ, Mavura PT (2004) Distribution of pesticide residues in various lake matrices: water, sediment, fish and algae, the case of Lake Nakuru, Kenya: The African network for chemical analysis of pesticides: Inaugural conference Proceedings.
  235. Wang J, Chen C (2006) Biosorption of heavy metals by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review. Biotechnol Adv 24: 427-451.
  236. Wang G, Yinglan A, Jiang H, Fu Q, Zheng B (2015) Modeling the source contribution of heavy metals in surficial sediment and analysis of their historical changes in the vertical sediments of a drinking water reservoir. Journal of Hydrology 520: 37-51.
  237. Wolski, EA, Murialdo, SE and Gonzalez, JF, 2006 Effect of pH and inoculums size on pentachlorophenol degradation by Pseudomonas sp., Water SA 32: 93-97.
  238. Wilson EO (2002) The Future of Life. Little Brown & Company, Warner Books, Lebanon, IN.
  239. Xie XH, Liu N, Yang B, et al. (2016) Comparison of microbial community in hydrolysis ac idification reactor depending on different structure dyes by Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 111: 14-21.
  240. Vandevivere PC, Bianchi R, Verstraete W (1998) Review: Treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile wetprocessing industry: Review of emerging technologies. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 72: 289-302.
  241. Vanhulle S, Enaud E, Trovaslet M, Billottet L, Kneipe L, et al. (2008) Coupling occurs before breakdown duringbiotransformationofAcidBlue 62 by white rot fungi. Chemosphere 70: 1097-1107.
  242. Vidali M (2001) Bioremediation. An overview. Pure Appl Chem 73: 1163-1172.
  243. Waddell BL, Zahm SH, Baris D, Weisenburger DD, Holmes F, et al. (2001) Agricultural use of organophosphate pesticides and the riskof non-Hodgkin‘s lymphoma among male farmers (UnitedStates). Cancer Causes Cont 12: 509-517.
  244. Wedemeyer G (1967) Dechlorination of 1, 1, 1-Trichloro-2, 2-bis (pchlorophenyl) ethaneby Aerobacter aerogene. J Appl Microbiol 15: 569-574.
  245. White VE, Knowles CJ (2000) Effect of metal complexation on the bioavailability of Nitriloacetic acid to Chelatobacter heintzii ATCC 29600 Arch. Microbiol 173: 373-382.
  246. Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecol 1-20.
  247. Xu F (1996) Oxidation of phenols, anilines, and benzenethiols by fungal laccases: Correlation between activity and redox potentials as well as halide inhibition. Biochemistry, 35, 7608‑7614.
  248. Xiao P, Mori T, Kamei I, Kondo R (2010) Metabolism ofOrganochlorine Pesticide Heptachlor and its Metabolite Heptachlor Epoxide by White-rot Fungi, Belonging to Genus Phlebia. FEMS Microbiol Lett 314: 140-146.
  249. Xiong A, Jayaswal RK (1998) Molecular characterization of a chromosomal determinant conferrinf resistance to zinc and cobalt ions in Staphylococcus aureus J Bacteriol 180: 4024-4029.
  250. Yan QX, Hong Q, Han P, Dong XJ, Shen YJ, et al. (2007) Isolationand characterization of a carbofuran‑degrading strain Novosphingobium spFND‑3. FEMS Microbiol Lett 271: 207-2.
  251. Yang L, Zhao YH, Zhang BX, Yang CH, Zhang X (2005) Isolation and characterization of a chlorpyrifos and 3, 5, 6‑ trichloro‑2‑pyridinol degradingbacterium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 251: 67-73.
  252. Yang J, Yang C, Jiang H, Qiao C (2008) Overexpression of methyl parathion hydrolase and its application in detoxification of organophosphates. Biodegradation 19: 831-839.
  253. Zhao L, Gu WM, He PJ Shao LM (2011a) Biodegradation potential of bulking agents used in sludge bio-drying and their contribution to bio-generated heat. Water Res 45: 2322-2330.
  254. Zhao L, Wang XY, Gu WM, Shao LM, He PJ (2011b) Distribution of C and N insoluble fractionations for characterizing the respective biodegradation of sludgeand bulking agents. Bioresour Techno l102: 10745-10749.
  255. Zimmer TM, Ohkuma MA, Ohta A, Takagi M, Schunck WH (1996) The CYP52 multigene family of Candida maltosa encodes functionally diverse n-alkane-inducible cytochromes p450,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 224: 784-789.
  256. Zimmer TM, Ohkuma MA, Ohta A, Takagi M, Schunck WH (1996) The CYP52 multigene family of Candida maltosa encodes functionally diverse n-alkane-inducible cytochromes p450,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 224: 784-789.
View PDF